Iran Breaks Nuclear Deal and UN Resolutions

by Majid Rafizadeh
December 15, 2016 at 4:30 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9584/iran-breaks-nuclear-deal

"We will have a new ballistic missile test in the near future that will be a thorn in the eyes of our enemies." – Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
The range of existing Iranian ballistic missiles has grown from 500 miles to over 1,250 miles (roughly 2,000 kilometers), which can easily reach Eastern Europe, as well as countries such as Israel.
In addition, Iranian Defense Minister Brig. Gen. Hossein Dehqan said that there would be no limit for the range and amount of missiles that Iran will develop.

The nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Agreement (JCPOA) -- effective, as of October 18, 2015, according to the State Department - clearly and distinctly stipulates that Iran should not undertake any ballistic missile activity "until the date eight years after the JCPOA Adoption Day or until the date on which the IAEA submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, whichever is earlier."

Not only is Iran avoiding honoring this stipulation, but also Iran's ballistic missile operations have significantly ratcheted up. More importantly, there has been no criticism at all from the Obama administration or other involved parties regarding this critical violation.

As cited by Iran's state-owned Fars News Agency, Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, Iran's commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, said in Tehran on Dec 6, 2016:

"In addition to enhancing the precision-striking power and quality of ballistic missiles, the Iranian authorities and experts have used innovative and shortcut methods to produce inexpensive missiles, and today we are witnessing an increase in production [of ballistic missiles]."

Iran is bragging about it.

In addition, Iranian Defense Minister Brig. Gen. Hossein Dehqan said that there would be no limit for the range and amount of missiles that Iran will develop. He boasted:

"90 percent of the country's defense systems have reached an acceptable standard and enjoy competitive quality compared with the weapons of advanced countries; production of the national individual weapons and efforts to improve the quality and precision-striking power of ballistic missiles are among the defense ministry's achievements in the defense field."

Fars News reported on a December 6, 2016 statement from Iran's Defense Minister:

"His remarks came as the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) fired 2 home-made 'Qadr H' ballistic missiles from the Eastern Alborz Mountains at a target in Iran's Southeastern Makran seashore some 1400km away... The missiles were fired on the sidelines of the main stage of the IRGC drills in Central Iran and various parts of the country."

One missile, which was launched on March 2016, had a clear message written on it that said in the Hebrew language: "Israel should be wiped off the Earth". Fars Agency adds:

"Qadr is a 2000km-range, liquid-fuel and ballistic missile which can reach territories as far as Israel... The missile can carry different types of 'Blast' and 'MRV' [Multiple Reentry Vehicle] payloads to destroy a range of targets. The new version of Qadr H can be launched from mobile platforms or silos in different positions and can escape missile defense shields due to their radar-evading capability."

Iran has repeatedly test-fired, long-range ballistic missiles and laser-guided surface-to-surface missiles. For example, on March 2016, Iran tested a new ballistic missile, capable of carrying multiple warheads. More recently, Iran fired a test missile with an accuracy within 25 feet, which is characterized as "zero error," according to Brig. Gen. Ali Abdollahi, the Iranian military's deputy chief of staff, and Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency.

The range of existing Iranian ballistic missiles has grown from 500 miles to over 1,250 miles (roughly 2,000 kilometers), which can easily reach Eastern Europe, as well as countries such as Israel.

According to a previous report obtained by the Associated Press, the launches are "destabilizing and provocative" and the Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile and Qiam-1 short-range ballistic missile fired by Iran are "inherently capable of delivering nuclear weapons."

In addition to violating the nuclear agreement, provoking and threatening other nations, and destabilizing the region, Iran is breaching two UN Security Council Resolutions. Security Council resolution 2231 (section 3 of Annex B) "calls upon Iran not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology."

The second United Nations Security Council resolution, 1929, states:

"Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities."

Iran has the largest ballistic missile arsenal in the Middle East. It is also the most diversified one. No country, other than Iran, has acquired long-range ballistic missiles before obtaining nuclear weapons. Ballistic missiles can be used for offensive or defensive purposes, but sophisticated missiles are more likely developed as delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons.

These missiles have the capability of carrying multiple nuclear warheads. Iran Tasnim news agency reported:

"Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan praised the country's military might...saying the Islamic Republic can mass produce ballistic missiles with any range and destructive power... In the missile sphere, Iran has been able to maximize the accuracy of projectiles, as emphasized by Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, with reliance on the local forces, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh said at an academic ceremony in Tehran on Tuesday."

Iran is also is increasingly provoking other countries in the region, and has made it clear that the ballistic missiles are aimed at targeting other nations. Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said previously to FARS news agency that "Iran has built missiles that can hit targets at 2,000 Km. They are designed to hit Israel at such a distance." He added that Islamic countries have surrounded Israel and "its [Israel's] life is short. So it will collapse in any given war -- long before a missile is even fired."

Iran also exports these missiles to its proxies across the region. Tasnim news agency quoted General Hossein Salami as saying:

"Hezbollah has 100,000 missiles that are ready to hit Israel to liberate the occupied Palestinian territories if the Zionist regime repeats its past mistakes... today, the grounds for the annihilation and collapse of the Zionist regime are (present) more than ever."

In addition, Gen. Salami warned Israeli leaders that if they make the "wrong move," Israel would come under attack.

It is crucial to point out that both Iran's so-called "moderates" and hardliners are on the same page when it comes developing ballistic missiles. When his country was unveiling a new missile, Fateh 313, President Hassan Rouhani pointed out that "we will have a new ballistic missile test in the near future that will be a thorn in the eyes of our enemies."

The Obama administration, the international community, a major global power, or a coalition of nations need robustly to confront these provocations, threats, and violations of the nuclear deal and UN Security Council Resolutions by Iran.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, political scientists and Harvard University scholar is president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He can be reached at Dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu.

Follow Majid Rafizadeh on X (formerly Twitter)

© 2024 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Related Topics: Iran, Iranian Nuclear Program

Recent Articles by Majid Rafizadeh

The Possibility of a 'Golden Age' in the Middle East, 2024-11-16
Peace in the Middle East: The First Step, 2024-11-09
Global Threat: The Biden-Harris Administration Is Enabling Iran to Become the Next Nuclear State, 2024-11-02
Iranian Missiles Hit Europe: Europe Does Nothing, 2024-10-26
Israel Fights Alone, Carrying by Itself a Catatonically Suicidal West, 2024-10-19

receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list.

Comment on this item

9 Reader Comments

Jack Thomas • Mar 6, 2017 at 17:50

Was Obama naive in his dealings with Iran or was he working for the enemy?

Such naivety seems improbable so we must assume the latter. Hopefully Trump will find a way to bring justice to him.

Reply->

Ted Dolkens • Dec 18, 2016 at 00:22

The only thing that would surprise me about Iran breaking the terms of this treaty would be if anybody was surprised.

Reply->

Rob Manzoni • Dec 17, 2016 at 10:15

So much for Barak Obama's claims of seeking peace through his "accord" with the state which calls the USA "The Great Satan"; and whose Atyatollah stated openly - after the agreement was reached, but BEFORE Obama released the money - YES, CERTAINLY - DEATH TO AMERICA...

With "peace" like this, who needs war?

But Obama's intention was never to rein in Iran - it was almost certainly to change the Middle East Balance of Power and destabilise the region to the detriment of Israel, a country which his early Muslim upbringing has taught him to hate.

Obama has now returned Iran's blocked billion$; and added millions - perhaps a billion - completely against US law - to persuade Iran to release the US citizens they'd held hostage for so long.

Did he use the US advantage to get the release of Iran's many "political" prisoners? NO
Did he ask Iran to stop advancing- and supporting international terror? NO
DID he react with force, when Iran's navy "arrested" (read: "attacked") US naval personnel? NO

So what did he actually achieve?

He capitulated to Islam.
He showed Iran who is boss - the Ayatollah
He displayed his subordination to Islam, when he bowed low - to the "King" of Arabia...

And he claims that Donald Trump is "singularly unqualified" to be president...

Reply->

Michael Martin-Smith

Rob Manzoni • Dec 17, 2016 at 13:41

Israel and by extension the West faces an existential threat from the Islamic Empire of Iran. The declared intention of that empire and its catspaws in Hizbollah and Hamas et al is the extermination of Jewry and Israel and, as a side show, the destruction of the Palestinian hope for "Liberation".
There is no concession by the West which can dim this determination
Our response should be
1/ a full-on admission of Israel into the membership of a revitalized NATO - a full blooded offensive and defensive alliance with Israel.
2/ an immediate enlargement of the "Arrow" and "David's Sling" anti-missile systems of Israel.
3/ The Islamic Empire must be faced with implacable opposition to its openly stated aims. Like it or not, the options tried by people driven at least in part by antipathy to Jews and/or Israel lead to only one outcome- an eventual confrontation with an outcome carved in the glassified wastes of desert sand.
The placation of the Empire of Iran will be the Earth itself. A very poor bargain indeed!

Reply->

dm • Dec 15, 2016 at 23:52

The Iran deal has long been known to be a disaster, which has promoted intense activity in manufacturing and testing long range missiles to annihilate Israel or in fact any other country that does not agree with their murderous religious ravings. Obama was, and is indeed still aware of his treacherous activity against the American people and indeed the world by letting the Iran deal slide by. Unfortunately for Obama, people have become politically very clued and his political treason is well understood by many ordinary people.

Let us hope that a prompt semblance of sanctions are put into place by Trump, and activity for negating any further manufacture of weapons of destruction.

The sanctions on trade that our wonderful Obama reversed need to be put back in place and the funding of billions that Obama made IN CASH to the Iranians, needs to have some methodology where some of that money is sealed, returned or blocked.

Prior to the signing, so called! of the Iran deal, American business men and government officials were sitting in Iran waiting for the deal to go through so that they could grab the deals that would come out of the country once those billions were unloaded. All this says little for the govt in power and indeed the American business men who would be making money on the dead bodies of their own countrymen in future. Not to mention destruction of part of the planet.

Reply->

Terence Curry • Dec 15, 2016 at 09:37

The article says that here has been no outcry from the Obama administration, regarding Iran's breaking of the agreement. An agreement they never intended to keep anyway. Remember in the furtherance of Islam, they are allowed,nay encouraged to lie in order to deceive the infidel. Their eagerness to wipe out Israel, which was not part of any negotiation,let alone deal, leaves little room for any doubt about their intentions.they have no qualms in openly stating it. Israel must be wiped out. Obama's birth, and even where he was born are the subject of debate. His attitude and conduct anent Islam are suspicious to say the least as is his attitude towards Israel. As far as any special relationship goes, between us, and the US, it is defunct. Obama said as much, and even had the bust of Churchill removed from the oval office. Hopefully Trump will revive it. At least we know he is an American.

Reply->

DockyWocky • Dec 15, 2016 at 08:54

Only a fool like Obama would trust the Iranians. Obviously, they have never had the intention to keep any part of the Iran/Obama Nuclear Deal.

So what does the civilized world do about it?

First strike military action keeps popping up on the view screen. And while considering this option, why entertain conventional military action when all kinds of nuclear options are available that significantly reduce non-Iranian casualties.

Reply->

David Hersch • Dec 15, 2016 at 07:37

This so-called agreement is already dead and Iran is looking in their arrogance for trouble and it will come their way. The world cannot afford Iranian hegemony.

Reply->

Hanna • Dec 15, 2016 at 06:49

"Israel should be wiped off the earth". Thank you Mr. President --- you, finally, found a "legacy". It might not be exactly what you hoped for, as you were warned many times, but it is a "legacy", never the less, your " legacy". GOD HELP US ALL!!! Thank you Majid Rafizadeh and Gatestone.

Reply->