UN Gives Palestinians Flags, But No Democracy

by Khaled Abu Toameh
September 17, 2015 at 5:00 am

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6503/palestinian-flag-democracy

Translations of this item:

The vote in favor of hoisting the flag is not going to bring democracy, freedom of expression and transparency to the Palestinians.
The vote at the UN concerning the Palestinian flag came amid increased human rights violations by both the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas. But since when does the UN care about human rights violations committed by the PA and Hamas against their own people?
Who cares if Hamas arrests Fatah voters and candidates as long as a Palestinian flag is raised in front of the UN? The UN considers raising a Palestinian flag more important than demanding an end to human rights violations by the PA and Hamas. No UN member states bothered to denounce the Hamas crackdown and the obstruction of the Fatah election.
The countries that voted in favor of the motion do not really care about the needs and interests of the Palestinians. The vote was mainly directed against Israel -- to taunt Israel rather than help the Palestinians move closer towards building an independent state.
A Palestinian living in the West Bank or Gaza Strip does not really care if his flag is flown in front of a UN building. For Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, there are more urgent matters such as the harsh economic conditions and the repressive measures of the Hamas regime.
Hamas wants the world to continue believing that the Palestinians are still unable to rebuild their homes because of Israeli "restrictions" and lack of international funds. That is why the journalists who tried to cover the removal of the debris were physically assaulted and detained for interrogation.
The situation under the PA in the West Bank is not any better with regards to human rights violations. Almost every day, PA security forces arrest several Palestinians and hold them without trial.

Last week, the United Nations General Assembly voted in favor of a motion allowing the Palestinian flag to be flown in front of the UN buildings.

The Palestinian Authority (PA) leadership and various "pro-Palestinian" groups have hailed the vote as a "symbolic victory" for the Palestinians. The Palestinian representative to the UN, Riyad Mansour, said that the vote regarding the flag would be "another step" towards solidifying Palestinian statehood.

The 119 UN member states that voted in favor of the motion are apparently convinced that this is a "big victory" for the Palestinians and their political aspirations. But what these countries do not know is that flying a Palestinian flag outside UN buildings is probably the last thing Palestinians need at this stage.

The vote in favor of hoisting the flag is not going to bring democracy, freedom of expression and transparency to Palestinians. The Palestinians do not need "symbolic victories" such as the one concerning the Palestinian flag.

A Palestinian living in the West Bank or Gaza Strip does not really care if his flag is flown in front of a UN building. For Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, there are more urgent matters that need to be dealt with immediately, such as the harsh economic conditions and the repressive measures of the Hamas regime. For those living in the West Bank, economic development, employment and democracy are more important than any flag raised in front of the UN headquarters.

But the countries that voted in favor of the motion do not really care about the needs and interests of the Palestinians. They do not care if the Palestinian Authority and Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip respectively are functioning as repressive and corrupt regimes that have no respect for human rights or public freedoms.

The vote was mainly directed against Israel. Its main goal was to taunt Israel rather than help the Palestinians move closer towards building an independent state.

The vote at the UN concerning the Palestinian flag came amid increased human rights violations by both the PA and Hamas. But since when does the UN care about human rights violations committed by the PA and Hamas against their own people?

The UN state members that voted in favor of raising the flag pay attention to human rights violations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip only when there is a way to lay the blame on Israel.

In recent weeks, Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip have reported a number of incidents that demonstrate how the Palestinian Authority and Hamas continue to show complete disregard for due process, human rights and freedom of expression. These incidents continued even as the 119 UN members raised their hands in favor of the hoisting of the Palestinian flag.

In the Gaza Strip, for example, Hamas security officers beat and detained a number of local journalists who tried to cover the removal of debris from homes that were destroyed during last year's military confrontation between Hamas and Israel.

One of the journalists, Fadel al-Hamami, was hit in the face with the butt of a rifle and had to rush to a hospital for treatment.

Hamas does not want journalists to cover any reconstruction work in the Gaza Strip. It wants the world to continue believing that the Palestinians are still unable to rebuild their houses because of Israeli "restrictions" and lack of international funds.

That is why the journalists who tried to cover the removal of the debris were physically assaulted and detained for interrogation.

The UN General Assembly, of course, did not hear about this incident when its members voted in favor of raising the Palestinian flag outside its buildings. Even if the UN does hear about it, it is unlikely that the General Assembly or the Security Council would ever issue a statement condemning the assault on representatives of the media.

Nor is the UN going to condemn Hamas's use of force to disperse Palestinians protesting against power cuts in the southern Gaza Strip. The lack of electricity has triggered widespread protests throughout the Gaza Strip, where many Palestinians hold the Hamas government fully responsible. Eyewitnesses said Hamas policemen used live ammunition and clubs to disperse the protesters.

Last week, Hamas arrested 30 Fatah activists in the Gaza Strip as part of its crackdown of supporters of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The arrests came as Fatah was holding internal elections for its leaders in the southern Gaza Strip. The detainees later went on a hunger strike in the Hamas prison. This incident also coincided with the UN vote concerning the flag. However, none of the UN state members bothered to denounce the Hamas crackdown and obstruction of the Fatah election. Who cares if Hamas arrests Fatah voters and candidates as long as a Palestinian flag is raised in front of UN buildings?

In the past two weeks, Hamas security officers in the Gaza Strip arrested a journalist and political activist whose only crime was that they dared to criticize Hamas. The journalist, Shadi Shaheen, works for an Arabic Gulf newspaper. Hamas confiscated his computer and camera.

The political activist, Mohamed Abu Mahadi, is known for his outspoken criticism of both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. He was detained by Hamas policemen as he was visiting his brother in Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Abu Mahadi was released after interrogation.

The situation under the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank is not any better with regards to human rights violations. Almost every day, PA security forces arrest several Palestinians and hold them without trial.

Last week, the PA issued a directive banning its security personnel from criticizing the Palestinian leadership on social media.

The ban came as PA security officers detained a Palestinian from the West Bank city of Tulkarem who criticized PA Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah on Facebook. The man was identified as Abdullah Nash'at Sayed.

Sayed is not the first Palestinian to land in prison for posting critical remarks on Facebook against Palestinian leaders. More than 14 Palestinians have been arrested or summoned for interrogation in the West Bank over the past three years for their activities on social media.

Still, the UN and other international organizations are not interested in holding a debate about these assaults on human rights and freedom of expression.

These organizations are more interested in provoking and condemning Israel than helping the Palestinians build democracy and proper transparent institutions. That is why the UN considers raising a Palestinian flag more important than demanding an end to human rights violations by the Palestinian Authority and Hamas. With such an attitude at the UN, the Palestinians will eventually get their own flag flown outside those buildings. But they will also end up with a state that has no respect for human rights -- all thanks to the indifference and corruption of the UN and other international bodies.

Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on X (formerly Twitter)

© 2024 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Related Topics: Palestinian Authority

Recent Articles by Khaled Abu Toameh

How the International Community Can Best Help the Palestinians, 2024-12-20
Why Arabs and Muslims 'Betrayed' Hamas, 2024-12-09
Hamas Must Be Defeated, Not Legitimized, 2024-11-10
Iran's New Plan: Lost Gaza, So Take West Bank, 2024-09-05
Iran's War Against Israel - From the West Bank, 2024-08-28

receive the latest by email: subscribe to the free gatestone institute mailing list.

Comment on this item

10 Reader Comments

Israel L. Monzon Gonzalez • Sep 22, 2015 at 16:51

If the UN was interested in democracy, Saudi Arabia would not head the human rights panel. If the UN was interested in democracy, Venezuela and Iran would not be on the human rights council. If the UN was interested in democracy, the vast majority of condemning resolutions would not be directed at a pluralistic, free and democratic state. If the UN was interested in democracy, the would not have remained silent in Rwanda's hour of need, in Darfur's, in Ethiopia's. It would not have in such a cavalier manner minimized and ignored the plight of the Christians of the Middle East. If the UN was interested in democracy, the world might be a better place that what they have allowed it to become.

Reply->

Christopher Field • Sep 19, 2015 at 22:33

I am in general agreement with this article. Israel will never leave the West Bank, no matter the internal pressures to leave and it is growing, no matter the external pressures until Gaza is resolved. Understandably as well.

Ten years ago, one of the most warlike of all the Israelis leaders, Ariel Sharon unilaterally withdrew their all the settlements, soldiers and transportable infrastructure wanting as little as possible to do with Gaza.

The results of Sharon's gamble we see today and it is very ugly. Israel very reasonably will not repeat what is seen by most as a huge misstep on the road to peace without powerful incentivised guarantees from the world that Palestinians will not attack as they do now from Gaza.

We can all assist to advance the peace process by looking forward rather than in the rear view into a peaceful future. It simply a better way to get there.

Reply->

Doug Mayfield • Sep 18, 2015 at 14:58

Given its long history of antipathy to freedom and individual rights and its active encouragement of a world-wide authoritarian state under the auspices of a UN mandate, it is no surprise that the UN does not encourage democracy for the Palestinians or anyone else.

In fact, the UN has a long history of embracing socialist and Islamic tyrants and discouraging free countries.

To see clear evidence of this, one need look no further than the countries which are appointed to UN committees on such issues as Women's Rights, Human Rights, etc.

The nations on these committees routinely violate the rights of their own citizens. Why would they treat the citizens of other countries any differently?

Reply->

Jacob T Chachkes • Sep 17, 2015 at 21:24

There seems to be an ignoring of the prevalence, if not preponderance, of UN members who violate human rights.

Reply->

Harvey • Sep 17, 2015 at 17:52

They are called the United Nations for one reason, that is there deep seated hatred for Israel and Jews. As the writer says, there is no interest at this cesspit on the east river for human rights unless they can point a finger at Israel. It should be shut down and funding stopped it does more harm than good.

Reply->

Neal • Sep 17, 2015 at 16:15

Khaled Abu Toameh once again scores big in my mind for his keen, analytical insights.

Reply->

Atilla • Sep 17, 2015 at 13:55

The two most subversive and evil organizations in existence are the UN and the EU.

Both are anti-Semitic, Islamic sympathizers whos doctrine, as shown by Merkel's " immigrant " stance, owes its allegiances to the Frankfurt School founders.

Reply->

Steven L • Sep 17, 2015 at 12:09

The UN-RWA was created and funded by the West as a means to destroy Israel and the Jews. The war against the Jews continues UN-abated.

Reply->

John Richmond • Sep 17, 2015 at 07:21

We should not be surprised at the disinterest for human rights and justice shown to Palestinians by their leaders, be they Hamas, PA or Fatah. Constant victimisation of their own people, blamed on Israel, lines the pockets of the corridors of power, like Abbas and his $13M palace, from UN and Arab states donations intended to rebuild Gaza.

Thus, funding to rebuild destruction caused by their own actions, is stolen to maintain the corrupt lifestyle of Palestinian leaders and blamed on Israel. Has no one thought that 'the lady doth protest too much'.

A modicum of common sense, which would not occur to UN delegates and institution, would ask why so many billions of dollars donated over 60 decades has failed to produce anything other than a militarised, corrupt leadership whose real intention is to maintain their followers in as much destitution as possible, blame this on Israel and, of course, the world-wide Jewish conspiracy, and continue lining their own pockets from funding destined to construct something approximating to a democratic state.

Does it not also seem strange that their constant appeals, inshallah, bears no fruit other than increased deprivation and destitution. Or so a cynic may believe.

Reply->

Hanna • Sep 17, 2015 at 06:54

The UN was originally established to promote world peace -- what a joke! Nowadays its sole purpose is bashing and attacking Israel, the one and only PEACEFUL COUNTRY in the entire Middle East. IT IS HIGH TIME to send these anti-Semites packing -- out of New York City!!! They don't give a hoot about the Palestinians and neither does Hamas or the Palestinian Authority. Thank you Khaled Abu Toameh and Gatestone.

Reply->