The Biased Media: What They Make It Their Business Not to See

Freedom of speech is under attack here in the United Kingdom.
Our quasi-Marxist government does not appreciate opposition or dissent. People are being imprisoned for airing their opinions by texts, emails and other means. Surely whether right or wrong, a free person may express their views without fear of arrest and imprisonment? Not in the United Kingdom it appears.

Once again I ask, why does the USA still store nuclear weapons in Turkey?

Excellent article on how it really is in the middle east against Israel.

The Pasha Dictatorship has shown that he can do whatever he wants From building his Billion dollar home to killing defenseless Christians and Kurds Backs off Greece, as they have acquired some very sophisticated weapons to defend themselves The average Turk is last on the list, and it shows just another narcissistic, malicious dictator.

Why, indeed? Why was Saddam Hussein not condemned globally for slaughtering whole villages and towns of Iraqis Kurds with one of his ignored weapons of mass destruction: pesticides (also used on Jews during the Holocaust, albeit not the same one)? Why was the Turks slaughter of Armenians, not condemned during, before and after WWI. Whe were the Hamas and Hezbollah attacks on Israel not condemned far more forcefully, and THEY not held to account for that? 1st guess, fear of Muslim reprisals. But the real question we should ask is WHY has this cult of hate been allowed, with virtual impunity, to continue to exist for nearly 1400 yrs, fomenting trouble and death wherever they go, and to spread their poison unchecked across the world??? No other religion or cult advocates the open murder of all the rest of humanity who do not wish to "convert". No other religion or cult I know of follows "holy" writings calling for murder, or forced "conversion"; and treats all others like subhuman scum. Others advocate a separateness from other groups than their own, but not to the same extent or in the same manner as Islam demands, meanwhile offering "paradise" only as a whim of its deity, that can only be earned by murdering others; that sounds more like gangs of thugs than anything approaching the definition of a religion. I know this will offend many, but they are questions that must be answered honestly, at SOME point. A nearly 1400 yr history of murder, kidnapping for ransom, piracy, and other acts NORMALLY treated by virtually all other peoples as criminal acts allowed to rampage unchecked requires explanation!

I hate most American college kids. They are uninformed and stupid. When Enes Kanter was pointing this out, the NBA told him to shutup.

The media bias, what they refuse to see or report. It's simple.

1) what they don't see/report isn't happening!

2) Israel is a JEWISH country, and we all know the sordid history of the West toward Jews.

3) Jews are a tiny minority in most countries, who respect democracy & law and don't create chaos or burn half the city if they don't agree with something.

4)The big Muslim communities are their new voters who can make the difference, but who don't take no for an answer & believe the Sharia is above the Law of the land.

4) Conclusion:
DON'T offend the Muslims, but F*** the Jews & nothing will happen!

Erdogan's antisemitism on display for all to see, will any member of the worldwide antisemite community object? Of course not, no news unless it is Jews defending their right to exist; silence rules.

These people are worse than the Germans living under the Nazis. They are motivated by power and greed, not survival instincts, but they abet murder through antisemitism. If all the courts in the world dispensed justice, they would be jammed up for my lifetime at least.

Diliman Abdulkader's demands for a "two-state solution... for the Kurds and Turkey" are absolutely justified and their implementation is long overdue.
The UN had and has no interest in granting the Kurds, a tribe that is at home in parts of Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria, i.e. in the Middle East, a secure, independent future. The historically evolved settlement area of the Kurds covers approx. 500,000 km², but is not an ethnically homogenous compact settlement area. The borders of Kurdistan are therefore disputed, but not an insoluble problem, rather a pretext for inaction.

No one except Erdogan, with his aspirations for a neo-Ottoman empire, has fought so long and so brutally against any Kurdish aspirations for autonomy. In Iran and Iraq, the Kurds have areas in which they have been granted autonomous status, albeit with restrictions. This does not apply to Syria.

For good reason, the USA and its Western allies have relied exclusively on air combat in the fight against Da'esh and Al-Qaeda in Syria and Iraq, apart from intelligence operations, and left the far more dangerous ground fighting to the Peshmerga, i.e. the Kurdish fighters. After the end of active combat operations, however, it must be noted that the promises made by the USA and the EU to the victorious Kurds were not fulfilled, indeed downright betrayed, presumably out of fear that the Kurds might now, after 120 years of division and latent wars against their people, become independent by founding their own state of Kurdistan. The main opponents of this development are Turkey and Iran, both with a nationalist-institutionalized paranoia. As a NATO member, Turkey is acting relatively unchallenged in its war against the Kurds and has even been allowed to set up a "security zone", a buffer along the Syrian-Turkish border. Here, both Russia as the protecting power in Syria and the USA as the military coordinator in the fight against Da'esh have failed or made concessions to the indispensable NATO partner Turkey.
The UN has not only always failed in the Middle East conflict, but also in relation to the Kurds' aspirations for autonomy.

With "rules of no action motion" (The term "no-action motion" is used when a motion for adjournment of debate is made to block action on a specific draft resolution or decision), any discussion in the UN is effectively prevented if a member state submits a corresponding motion.
As a result, for example, there were no or only insignificant reactions:
- 1975-1979 Khmer Rouge genocide in Cambodia with over 2 million victims
- Continuous pogroms in Sri Lanka against the Tamils since 1983 with over 100,000 victims
- 1994 Genocide in Rwanda with approx. 1 million victims
- 1995 Complete failure of the UN in the genocide in Srebrenica
- Since 2004 Conflict in Darfur with around 600,000 deaths
- Houthi conflict in Yemen
- Wars in Africa since 2006 in Congo, Eritrea, Chad, the complete destabilization of the Sahel zone by the terrorist organization "Boko Haram" as a still active part of the "Islamic State"
- 2017/2018 Expulsion of around 1 million Rohingya from Myanmar (formerly Burma)
- 2017/2018 Turkish civil war against the Kurds in their own country and neighboring Iraq and later also in Syria

These are not exhaustive examples, but they clearly show how Israel alone is always at the forefront of the UN Human Rights Council, while other, much larger conflicts and conflict parties are hardly or not at all mentioned, such as the Kurds in the context of Turkey.

Turkey's neo-Ottoman, imperial aspirations under Erdogan are by no means limited to the Middle East and the Maghreb, but also have Europe in their sights. The founding of the "DAVA" party is particularly suspicious because Erdogan's Islamist AKP is miles away from democratic principles and the deceptive name "Democratic Alliance for Diversity and Awakening" does not correspond to reality.

The anti-Semitic left-wing fascists are in bed with Islam. That's why you never hear criticism from this corner when Muslims commit violence against Muslims. When a Muslim is violent, it is always resistance, so read in a positive way. It doesn't fit into their narrative that Muslims are always victims, never perpetrators. Their stupid propaganda shouldn't work at all with people with an IQ over 80, right?

In the case of the fascist Erdogan, it is also conceivable that he staged the attack himself (like the alleged military coup back then) and foisted it on the Kurds in order to distract from his domestic problems and his foreign policy failures.

This follows on from the previous article relating to UN-biased reporting on the part of the Media.

As the writer says NO JEWS - NO NEWS.
It isn't about fair, even-handed reporting, or honestly caring about the slaughter of innocents, whoever they might be. The Jews are always the target because the enemy of God and His people is intent on removing them from the face of the earth.

This is about spiritual warfare - not concern for man's inhumanity to man.