Biden Administration's Total Disregard for Iran's Protestors, Nuclear Threat

Joe Biden needs to support the protesters, not the Ayatollahs!

Suffice to say I'm intrigued by responses so far written. Comparing Iran and other worldly problems to those in USA and the lacking leadership to even recognize and discuss the causes.
Obama said to give him eight years and he'd get the job done. Whether that was to bind US around globalists' fingers or to neuter US to liberal uselessness, or to simply destroy US national identity until we implode, I cannot tell. The brainwashing began in schools and colleges. The Lamestream Media in my opinion is most culpable US decline. For it alone arbitrarily decided which stories to cover and what bias that coverage would be. Nobody dared to question nor challenge this due to societal and career suicide.
That's dictatorial Socialism.
Cammo99 below was correct mentioning the limited uprising compliments of Antifa and CRT. What stopped it however wasn't mentioned. In my opinion the Second Amendment, as proven by armed citizens protecting property and life, was what once again protected our Republic. Now however Obama's thugs and Marxist revolutionary grifters have picked a kinder and gentler war against the proletariat. They are claiming victimhood.
The catalyst for those who want to overthrow our Constitution is simple. Media manipulation. Control the news; control the thoughts. In this case AM talk radio and the internet served as necessary checks and balances.
As to why our government isn't active in deposing the Iranian Islamists? It's difficult for criminals masquerading as government to single out another government ran by similar criminals for destruction.

I have been reading a book by Dr. Azeem Ibrahim, title Radical Origins, I may not agree with Dr. Ibrahim's historical perspective of Islam, any more than I believe America's own history is infallible. I also am suspicious of a Golden Age much of it had to do with conquering and non Muslims who were less war like at such a fast pace they chose a more lenient form of occupation than they may have had they the forces to fully occupy their newly conquered territories and settlements. but his book is insightful in other respects specifically defining under Islam the conditions before Muslims can rebel (pg 125-126) "....defining when it is legal for a population to revolt against unjust rulers has been a debate from classical times to the contemporary...." The author also cites the UN's "Universal declarations and Human rights."
I believe this is an important area of study in particular as the US had a major revolt prior to the 2016 election that was largely ignored by the Democratic Party in power, a few score lives were lost and billions of dollars in property lost in despicable instances of arson that have never been investigated to the extent necessary and also who funded it?
The assumption being it is a home grown or western revolt and that I no longer believe true. I believe men like Farrakhan and within prison walls 5% Imams have been setting this stage for some time behind the scenes as much in conjunction or concert with the "deep state".

Recently we witnessed the murder of a young black man by 5 black policemen, what are the radicals in the black community blaming even if urging a peaceful response? Systemic Racism instituted in the nature of contemporary law enforcement. The theory claims sheriffs and other forms of constabularies were founded to oppress slaves. but that is not factual many of the first law enforcement agencies were founded in non-slave holding states.
It can not explain why 3% of antisemitic attacks are by white people but 70% are initiated by black people the remainder of the attacks are committed by other minorities.
We have other odd utterances from black celebrities like Whoopi Goldberg who claimed she cannot tell a Jew on the street, she lived in NYC she never went to parts of Brooklyn, walked by a synagogue, doesn't know what a yarmulke or tzitzit are? Why lie?
CRT posits whites are evil, yet they perpetuating the myth of color and sometimes even accepted racial distinctions. And there intent to command a objectionable policy of reparation seems born greed more than justice when non-slaves demand reparations from non slave holders and in states that never had slavery.
The disturbing aspect of it is they are not asking reparations from Islamic nations who's traders took them by force and sold them into slavery. The Missionary Dr' Livingston who witnessed one such "salve raid," claimed 90% of the natives died in the raid.
It is these sorts of omissions that should make a person suspicious of whether their is an Islamic dynamic involved inciting a revolt in the false claims of CRT, Systematic Racism etc. as only ascribable to "white" people.
Replacing the ideals of all persons created equal with material equity.
We need to have historical perspective, in one aspect the Ottoman Turk's annihilation of 1.4 million or more Armenians and non-Muslim minorities and their subjugation of non-Muslims is forgotten.
When the Ottoman Empire collapsed and was compelled by treaty to abandon their colonies and settlements in the Balkans, 5 million Muslims returned to the Anatolia. Annihilating 1.4 million people and looting their homes and property was a result. What is more horrible is that even if the German people suspected that Jews and other peoples were being exterminated they did not actively participate in the barbarity. Professional executioners committed the atrocities serving their fuhrer's agenda but a sentiment shared by many Europeans. The Turkish people participated sometimes in communities in the annihilation of non-Muslims they sometimes described those people just "disappeared in the desert." Some Armenians were murdered in the same manner slaves were chained a thrown overboard off slave ships in fear of being boarded. But there were no boarding parties.

Because criticism of "Islam" is now Islamophobia and such or any instance of an infidel criticizing Islam must be censored. Ask the other Dr. Ibrahim if that is true. Hence radicals in the U.S. are in sync both in the "mainstream" black community and Black Islam perhaps even Black Israelites and not seeing the obvious parallels is intellectually dishonest and serves no ideological purpose. It comes rapped in their own expression of supremacy. Welcome to the human race. But infallible? I think not.

This is the number one priority of the Biden regime, giving legitimacy to the Obama administration's Nuclear Deal with Iran.
This supersedes or is a higher priority even than Ukraines survival from the Russian invasion, explaining the timidity of the Biden Administration's arming of Ukraine's military with the weapons needed for Ukraine to oust Russia from Ukrainian soil, since Russia is negotiating the Nuclear Deal for the Biden Administration with Iran.
It also is a way for the Biden Administration to end the Palestinian/Israeli impasse.
Iran has left no doubt about what will happen once it obtains nuclear weapons, and with its ally, Russia, it will have nothing to fear from retaliation.
Throughout Europe, and in increasingly influential anti-Israel communities in the US, including far leftist in the Democratic Party, there is mounting criticism of Israel, and increasing support for groups and countries which are actively opposed to Israel.
These movements don't occur overnight, but are supported by large amounts of money, active, widespread media support and recruitment of public protest. The academic universities, corporate media, and leftist universities are shifting American public opinion against Israel and the absolute silence from government and media about Iranian human rights abuses means support for Israel is evaporating and support for Obama's Nuclear Deal is seen as a way to bring peace to the Middle East, even if it means at the Israeli's expense, which has been a recurring theme for the last two thousand years.
Even the Israelis are verging on civil war over this issue, which no doubt both Washington and Tehran are united in their pleasure over.

When does Israel act? Is the IDF still opposed to doing something? Iran does not need to nuke Israel. All it needs is a few nukes to blackmail Israel by increasing funding to proxy forces like Hezbollah, Hamas etc.

Iran says, "Hey sorry that Hezbollah just fired 5,000 rockets killing 1,467 Israeli's. Not our problem and don't think about doing anything against us because 1 nuke each on Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem, Be'ersheva and Dimona and it's over for you, so don't even think about it. Shame if Hamas launches 1000 missiles at you. Have a nice day."

One must surely imagine the problem is that there are laws that also impinge upon the Biden administration that would also have an impact related to the US administrations actions. That they will have difficulties related to their own actions, which may be seen as being in a way parallel to those of Iran. This is exactly why I have for a long time now, debated that a government must ALWAYS act to the highest ethical standards, or be seen as Ultra Vires, beyond the law. Any government that does not act to the highest ethical standards sets it's own trap for any action of theirs; that does not fit the need for the highest ethical standards. A classic Catch 22. We cannot tell them what not to do; when we do the same thing ourselves.

The only way the USA is going to do anything about Iran is to vote the Biden Administration out of office and hope the next administration has the backbone to do something.

Despite the many articles and the overwhelming evidence of Iran's ambitions to become a nuclear power, the very same response by Biden and other Western leaders results in absolutely nothing being done to prevent a crazy Mullah the head of a crazy Islamic regime gain a weapon that can and will be used indiscriminately to attack the "Infidel".
I honestly give up on leaders of the West, they do nothing to prevent aggression towards peaceful countries and people. I really think they are terrified of everything Islam does. Islam's ambition is to convert the whole of humanity.