Facebook: Championing Blasphemy Laws

Have a look at this book, The Blasphemy Law. The author Salman Shami is someone new. It took a lot of courage for him to even broach the subject. Apparently, his biggest opposition came from Facebook. He was banned several times just for talking about the book. If you want more info here is his website.
http://salmanshami.com/

Please note the hypocrisy at play here. Islam is not allowed to be rationally criticised as a monolithic block, but Islam is allowed to speak as a monolithic block i.e. "the entire Muslim Ummah"

Islam has managed to get an alliance with the Left primarily because of the LEFT'S hatred of Capitalism, The WEST, Western Values, Christianity!
The LEFT has no rationale for this HATRED & in tune with POSTMODERNISM will not discuss anything!
This stance plays very well with ISLAM because if it is one thing that ISLAM cannot do is LOOK at ISLAM!
POSTMODERNISM being that is taught all over the WEST is a VERY POISONOUS CULT of HATRED that carried over from the FALL OF COMMUNISM once the so-called INTELLECTUALS realized that the GAME was up & that COMMUNISM was a BRUTAL FAILURE & so POST MODERNISM was INVENTED to TEAR down WESTERN SOCIETY & DESTROY!
It is a HORRIBLE IDEOLOGY & NEEDS to be STAMPED OUT! DECONSTRUCTION in PARTICULAR!

This biased Orwellian attitude is very bad. The worst thing is that it complements the rising antisemitism providing it the extra argument that this islamic invasion is a part of the world wide Jewish conspiracy. Zukerberg, Joel Kaplan, Soros, feminists, many Jewish leftists - they feed the antisemitic sentiments while organizations like Gatestone and Rebel media are doing really selfless work exposing the truth.

there's nothing surprising here; zuckerberg, et al., are the same folks trying to make a false analogy between the jews trying to escape nazi germany and muslim refugees from the incessant warfare in the middle east, most of the victims of which are muslim. in the 1930s, the jews were simply trying to escape extermination, but nobody would help them; today, OTOH, all these refugees have to do is go to a neighboring country, where those who share the same poisonous religion will (somewhat reluctantly) let them live. of course, the muslims of the arabian peninsula won't lift a finger or spend a riyal to help any of them, because they have terrorists embedded in their midst, but they're OK to be sent to the west, where only infidels live (who deserve to die horrible deaths, anyway, according the the cult of islam).

it is ironic that those who wish to see him dead are on the same side as zuckerberg. imagine that; a jewish nazi!

Social media, along with the US mainstream media is NOT to be trusted. It is biased to the point of becoming irrelevant. I choose carefully which outlets and personalities I trust most. We should all take that attitude.

What is "harmful content" according to the new Facebook guide for Muslims?
The answer is straight forward - it is purely and simply...everything. It requires FGM, mindless cruelty, oppression of women, glorification of men, hatred of Jews and Israel, the desire for the Jews to be "driven into the sea", no education of women, the enforcement of wearing the oppressive burka. Harmful content is also about the fearfully cruel punishments Islam metes out.

I was asked on Facebook to sign a petition "To Let Them In" and replied to that person, I'm sorry I can't do that. The following day I found thousands of "Peace loving Muslim" responses. No signs of peace, mercy or tolerance, but violence of all kinds, stoning, stabbing, burning alive, incarceration, etc. etc. My computer was hacked into by a "Peace Loving Muslim" Mr. Muhammad Fahad Lakhani who worked for NOD 32 who provided protection on my computer, and even with all the threats made to me in writing, going to the Police and Federal Police, who in their infinite wisdom sent an.... Yes you guessed it... a "Peace Loving Muslim" to talk to me. The Anti Discrimination Board here in NSW Protected Mr. Muhammad Fahad Lakhani and I was forced to move and miraculously I was treated as the terrorist. If you mention the fact that you can't use Internet banking because you have been terrorized by Muslims and your computer was hacked into when trying to arrange for direct debit payment's to insurance companies they start yelling at you and call you all sorts of names, just for stating a fact.

Those eight examples of what Muslims claim to define islamophobia are actually definitions of what Islam is.

It is getting close to the time when we all call it a day and get off FaceBook. Perhaps if I spread hate about those people - I will be banned or blocked which will save the effort 'smile'

"Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, wrote a Facebook post about making Facebook a 'safe space' for Muslims." It's so easy for Zuckerberg to compose from the environs of a guarded 50-acre estate a desire to establish "safe spaces" for Muslims when he will never be attacked by jihadists or have to listen to calls for prayers or have to live anywhere near them. The rest of us, in America, however, have no such safe spaces. We are drilled daily of the imperative to become "diverse" and "tolerant" of Muslims or else they'll complain to CAIR or ask the government to police our speech, as is done now in Britain. Zuckerberg helped Merkel make Germany submit to Islam by punishing anyone who objected to the Islamization of the country. Do-gooders such as Zuckerberg are the worst, hypocritical tyrants: "Do as I say, not as I do."

Zukerberg has PROVEN himself a "DICTATOR waiting in the wings", and, a PURE proponent of 1984 Orwellian CENSORSHIP!

Be DONE with FARCEBOOK!!!

"We the People..."; NEED to utilize better methods of communications so that ZUKER et al, can't SEE nor effect our personal communications! Try TOR!

#FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!

Yes, but Islam violates all elements of normal human behaviour. Who is going to protect us from them?

The WEST seems to have gone rather MAD!
Not since the INQUISITION have we had Blasphemy Laws yet here we are in the TWENTY FIRST Century facing BLASPHEMY LAWS imposed on the WEST by the LEFT of the WEST in Support of an IDEOLOGY who has a PUBLISHED AGENDA which sets out to DESTROY our Democracy!
How long is this IDIOCY going to be tolerated?
Our DEMOCRACY is facing IDIOTS now & we seem to be FACED with quite a LINEUP!
TRUDEAU would rank near the top! Merkel as a rather DOUR IDIOT but an IDIOT none the LESS! Teresa MAY a TERRIFIED IDIOT & as a RESULT a DANGEROUS IDIOT!
There are so many in the EU & SWEDEN that it is hard to know where to START!
DECEIVERS as well with BLAIR up there & MARXISTS with CORBYN leading!

Why bother with the 8 point list?

"Tell the truth about Islam"

Would have covered it.

When is some right-minded person going to start up a company like facebook to compete with this Zuckerberg clown. The person of the company that does with have a lot more subscribers than Facebook.
I sick of the anti conservative, anti christian, anti free speech of Facebook, Google and twitter. I'll guarantee you these owners/board of directors have already been warned by the mulsim that their organizations will be attacked like Charlie Hebro if the they don't submit to their will

"The guide does not mention Islamic incitement to violence, which is rampant on social media"
I'm guessing the guidance also makes no mention of hateful comments and memes aimed at Christians, which are also rampant on social media. Since the same standard is not applied to all faiths, this is quite clearly a pro-Islamic strategy.
Why is that Mr. Zuckerberg?
Where is the justice in that?

What about the safety of Jews and Christians?

People say the American Constitution's First Amendment only protects individual citizens (and corporations) from the government, but that private companies can enforce whatever rules they want to within their own domains.

But ... hey, guess what! NOT when their rules amount to CRIMES (say, of slander)!

See, whenever FASCBOOK (And Twitter and YouTube, and GOOGLE et al) humiliates people in public by censoring them and posting (slanderous, libelous) warnings, they are actually breaking the LAW.

Slander (and it's written form, libel) are sub-categories of criminal FRAUD.

Further, if (as can be easily demonstrated in these cases) they committed their fraudulent, defamatory slanders and libels as part of an orchestrated conspiracy to suppress and destroy evidence of the crimes of the holy-mobster "muslim" gang members of the world's oldest and largest ongoing extortion racket and crime-syndicate ("ISLAM") then they are also guilty of endorsing those same crimes (many of which amount to mass-murders, if not to actual genocide) and since islam itself is openly hostile to any and all sovereign nations (which it regards as temporary and man-made false idols, all of which are to be eventually destroyed and replaced with their own one-world muslim Ummah Nation, to be ruled over by their global theocratic caliphate government) it is also a clear case of sedition and treason, of aiding and abetting an existential threat to the United States and Western world in general.

Zuckerburg and his globalist minions should be arrested indicted tried convicted jailed and possibly executed for their treason to rationality and civilization and their ongoing crimes against humanity.

Beyond that, Twitter et al's lately-revealed "shadow-banning" practices really only amount to cases of de-monetizing "reverse" defamation, and so should be subject to massive penalties in class-action lawsuits as well.

Judith, I love your articles. You give us the information with no attempt to tell us what to think. The facts speak for themselves. I don't have a facebook account. I wish everybody could see facebook for the negative force and timewaste that it is.
Zuckerberg is, or pretends to be, convinced that Islam is benign.

I have never had a Facebook account and now never will, it has like the UN become an organisation rife with anti western antisemitic content and long left its original remit. It makes one wonder what Zuckerburg and the other useful idiots have been bought off with.

Let's look at Zuckerberg's comments in their proper context, for clarity of purpose:

"I want to add my voice in support of Mafiosis in our community and around the world... After the Sicily attacks and hate this week, I can only imagine the fear Mafiosos feel that they will be persecuted for the actions of other Mafiosos... If you're a Mafiosi in this community, as the leader of Facebook I want you to know that you are always welcome here and that we will fight to protect your rights to commit your crimes and create a peaceful and safe environment for you" ... and ... ""If you see someone sharing criminal content and encouraging others to join crime gangs, report them and then make or share posts that show true Mafia messages of peace, mercy and tolerance".

;-)

Zuckerberg and Kaplan are common Jewish surnames. I presume that both of these gentlemen are connected in their family backgrounds to Jewish parentage. If so, this may be an extreme case of "bending over backwards" to accommodate the business purpose of Facebook and further extend its reach and profits at the expense of their heritage.

According to the definition of islamophobia, I'm definitely islamophobic. All the definitions of what constitutes islamophobia are exactly what I dislike most about those Muslims who practice extreme forms of Islam.

As well, Zuckerburg seems to have lost his ability to reason. His concern for and treatment of Muslims is strange, to say the least. For him to believe that Muslims are hard done by and not the ones committing the most heinous of crimes is hard to believe. If he knows anything about what's happening in our world today, it's impossible not to know that the vast majority of terrorist attacks are committed by radical Muslims. Far from being the attacked, they are the attackers. Certainly, they are sometimes ill treated, but not nearly as often as Jews, who are a much smaller cohort. Zuckerburg needs to do some careful reading and put himself back on the right track.

Why do Muslims get treated better than British people? This is Britain and British people abide by the rules of Britain as should every one who moves to live here. Why can Muslims marry 6 year olds, have sex with their daughters, incest, mutilation and grooming thousands of kids to sell for sex and it all gets covered up except for token captures and light sentences while our homeless freeze on the streets. Why are Muslims given houses that British people should get? Why can muslims demand more mosques, demand halal food that Christians cannot eat as its banned by the Bible. What should happen is if these people want to live here? They should integrate, stop the terrorism or speak out and mean it not enjoy deaths. I want to know why Muslims get preference over British people in our country and finally one thing has been worrying me: if these are refugees, where are the women and kids are they left in the country the so-called refugees left?

The fact Facebook openly kowtoes, in both senses of the word, to Islam, and to the expressed exclusion of other ideologies, proves terrorism works on kafir and infidel.

But but but FB is just being thoughtful, and looking out for shareholders' interests: the Muslims of the planet are a large group of under exploited marketing targets. They have large numbers (1.2 billion I seem to have read somewhere) and need to buy stuff, and Facebook is just focusing on the margins available....

On average they are clearly not too demanding, and might even believe that FB loves them particularly, in the same way that they believe that their generally autocratic and kleptocratic governments care for their welfare...

"Follow the money trail"......

I wonder what Facebook would do if all its Muslim members who supported Muslim and Islamic attacks and terror against Conservative Judaeo-Christians and their values and culture were to face a similar legal action to the one of Larkin v Facebook in 2015 involving 100 of millions of Facebook users. Facebook would then have to become an Islamic only social media platform to exclusion of all those who were conservatives and supporters of Judaeo-Christian values and culture.

If FB were truly against hatred they would be condemning the Koran. We can start here. Koran 9:30 Sahih International: The Jews say, "Ezra is the son of Allah "; and the Christians say, "The Messiah is the son of Allah." That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?

http://loganswarning.com/

The vast majority of the mainstream US media have been following these same guidelines in their journalism as have most US politicians. The word Islamophobia is not only a bogus medical term but it has only one purpose to enable and protect Islamic Terrorists and those who support violent Jihad. There are Muslim haters such as the one who killed his Muslim neighbors for taking his parking place or the ones who deface mosques but they are not same as those how raise legitimate concerns about the violence done in the name of Islam. There are verses in the Koran that call for beheading and killing of the non-believers but the media refuses to discuss the meaning or even the existence of such verses and if anyone ever brings it up on the air experts from CAIR are on hand to explain that there are those who want to hijack their religion or who have created a violent form of Islam which is really a religion of peace but the news media never ask someone who has lived in an Islamic country as an Infidel and what their experiences are or someone who is from an Islamic country and speaks Arabic as to what the meaning of verses in the Koran are because newer translations have changed words like "kill," to "fight," when the word really means kill. What is going on by the actions on facebook and everywhere else in the world is a double standard that blasphemy only applies to Islam which is how the hate speech laws work n the UK and in Canada before they were removed from their human rights act. In the US a "Piss Christ" was allowed in an art show but a "Piss Mohamed," would never be allowed.

Has any "one" person, entity, group and/or group(s)/organization(s)... requested Mr. Zuckerberg write a "guide" developed especially for all other faith based teachings; i.e. Judaism that "facebook" as a social media platform that outlines... other than "Muslim Faith" that keep them "safe online" RE: hate & bigotry?

Let's debunk the "Islamophobia" signs in accordance with the Islamic doctrine:

1.) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

- The doctrine of Islam is "perfect, final and universal" and nothing can contradict it - although there are differences among the various groups following it, this is a fundamental principle in Islam.

2. Islam is seen as separate and 'other'. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.

- Islam does not have the Golden rule (do onto others as they would do to you), it treats those outside of Islam as Kaffir (described in the Qu'Ran as "the worst of creatures"), these can be either treated relatively well, or these can be treated very badly - such as deceived, abused, raped, tortured or killed.

- Islam is also an authoritative system, there's no space for critical thought or individual choice, it's based on absolute submission (a follower is a slave to the doctrine of Islam)

3. Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

- the doctrine of Islam is unchanged for the past 1400 years and mandates among the other: violent punishment, polygamy, second class citizen status for women, third class citizen status for non-Muslims

4. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a 'clash of civilisations'.

- the doctrine of Jihad is a principal part of Islam that made it successful in the first place, Islam was historically spread by Jihad and conquered every civilization it ever entered utilizing warfare, terror and politics

5. Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.

- more than half of the doctrine of Islam (the Qu'Ran and the Sunna of Mohammad) is not concerned with how to be a Muslim, but how to plot against non-muslims and spread Islam in power and numbers, until its reign is absolute. Such nature is political.

I'm 100 pct. confident that these rules were drafted by an Imam in order to follow another of principles straight out of the Islamic doctrine - "no criticism of Islam is allowed".

Some one at Gatestone or elsewhere needs to the collect the thousands of anti Jewish and anti Christian hate comments made by Islamists on Facebook. I would glady chip in a donation for that.

I would like to know if reporting the rape murder of an 8 year old Christian girl in Pakisatn, one of many such incidents, Pakistan an Islamic sharia law state heads the list as the most oppressive when it comes to respecting the religious rights of non-Muslims, is it Islamophobia to report these facts? Is it blasphemy to report what some consider a religious duty under Islam receives insufficient criticism in Islamic States as a crime against humanity?

the leader of facebook, is how zuckerberg refers to himself. as if it is a kingdom, a nation state, or perhaps a newly discovered galaxy. if one has a bit of sense it would be the time now to flap away from mr. zuckerberg and his leadership. we can leave the muslims, their supporters and sycophants who still have their heads attached alone. in which case they can spew their blood libels and acid hatred of western civilization and the Jews. they can plan and plot and foul the air without interference. there you go. happy at last.

Then try Right2Voice.com. Its a free speech alternative to Facebook. https://right2voice.com/

What is also and perhaps of greater import to anyone except a liberal secularist is there is no mention of anti-Christian bigotry that is often mentioned. Holocaust deniers have free reign on sites, yet those considerations are not "blasphemous" and the more important piece missing in facebooks rush to blasphemy is thee charges are placed and funded by Islamic States these are simply religious ridicule or intolerance Islam by its own admittance is a political entity and tolerance of ridicule and criticism which defines religion in the west is being discarded in this singular exemption of Islam from ridicule and criticism the intent is not to achieve "freedom of religious" expression which Christians, the believers in the Divine Christ not the apostate liberal church, are attacked for everyday in the west by liberals and hate groups it is to their company Islam is being defended as a supremacist's religion.

I would have no problem whatsoever following these guidelines, except for the blatantly provocative actions of some muslims, who seem to feel it is ok to 'pray' en masse in public areas, march through our streets waving well-known terrorist organisation's flags, shows of something I cannot even fathom, (chest thumping and head slashing, to name but two), and waving placards declaring 'death to those who mock islam', or 'behead those who insult islam', and 'death to democracy, freedom of speech, british troops, or even the police'! I find it mind-boggling that we are expected to swallow all of this without a word back, (if we say ANYTHING, we are labelled as racist. This is a sect, a cult, that does indeed promote terror, by enslaving, torture, beheadings and lashings, to name but a few punishments for the most tiny of crimes. My biggest bugbear with this ideology though, is the continued subjugation of women. To lash a woman or girl for being raped???? To insist that women cover themselves, (even infant daughters), up, for fear that seeing them otherwise would cause the males to not be able to control themselves!??!!, treating women as 2nd class citizens, having less than half the worth of a man, etc., etc.,, I could go on, and on. Until those entering our country are willing to assimilate and integrate, without these religious and mental shackles, there will ALWAYS be problems, and people prepared to speak up against them. We have been told over and over that we are a multicultural society. I don't remember signing up for that, and would appreciate the opportunity to keep at least some of England/Great Britain, intact.

Looks like Zuckerberg has too much time on his hands. He should live without any special facilities in one of the many muslim lands to understand this "peaceful" religion up close.

Mr. Zuckerberg has no other reason to make this policy of protection to Islam other than the economy (more money) and thus keep his platform functioning in the 57 Islamic republics. Mr. Zuckerberg is a disgrace.

Is Zuckerberg an American citizen? Has he got the best interests of his country at heart?
Perhaps the answer to that is no! I suppose he has to consider his financial situation and is concerned that he may lose advertising revenue from Muslim sources.
It took awhile for ISIS execution videos to be taken down from facebook, or the videos of chidren, after being beheaded in front of their parents. Zuckerberg has his pockets to worry about, and money is his only interest. Maybe he thinks he will be saved should Islam gain control. Either way, the man is a toad! Just as are the majority of Western leaders who are selling their people out to Muslims! Looking at the list of crimes aimed at those who oppose Islam is a joke. The world is gearing up for a takeover, bye bye values! Welcome the barbarity that is Islam!

Someone once told me "follow the golden rule" i.e. whoever has the gold makes the rules. The owners of Facebook seem more worried about business than people's safety. The O.I.C. is the largest voting bloc at the so-called U.N. and they have plenty of dollars to buy influence. A society that no longer believes in freedom of speech and the U.S. Constitution is doomed.