Europe's Childless Leaders Sleepwalking Us to Disaster

Plenty of American politicians have children, and they're doing the same thing. Biden has children, but cheers on the day when whites will be a minority in America. "It's a good thing," he says.

This is not shocking after hearing Dennis Prager's explanation of the threat of the Left. These people are taught that race matters more than Character and that character is everything not race. The last people to think this were the Nazi party. If this is true and it is the left needs to be exposed for what they really are. It is officially a racist comment if you say there is only one race and it is the human race at the University of California. Secular people almost NEVER have big families. All Europe believes in is working less and bigger welfare for them all. This is because they have no reason to want to reproduce their leftist culture. Why would you have open borders if you wanted to preserve your way of life?

I think it's pretty sad when parents arrogantly claim that having kids was what made them so selfless and concerned about future generations. If someone is unable to care about other people or their kids before having their own, then they are actually profoundly self centered.

I totally disagree. They are wide awake and know exactly what they're doing.

We are told on one hand that we need people to fill jobs in countries that have unemployment of their own so would it not be cheaper to get your own people to do these jobs and subsidise the jobs so people will take them rather than bringing people from countries that would cost you more and put pressure on the various services.

Many jobs are lost to advances in robotic technology and these jobs, which in many cases were low paid, will never return. I have no doubt that some of the people who come will excel in many areas of life but for a vast majority they will be a high cost in many ways with absolutely no return on the countries investment.

If you believe that one day these Muslim social welfare recipients, these anti-democratic fanatics, are going to finance your old age pension, then good luck with that. They will chop off your head in the name of their beloved Muhammad, and thereby save lots of money.

Don't expect any Christian social-welfare morality from those wild hordes.

Those fools who still believe that Germany may be capable of integrating 3 million Muslims, will be up for a very rude awakening indeed.

According to one of the smartest Germans out there, the well known lecturer Andreas Popp, right now there are 50 thousand (SIC!) Muslim terrorists on German territory, ready to strike, waiting for their orders from their Muslim leaders.

Do you really believe that the German authorities can cope with that?

If you want to know the future of Europe, then just have a look at Syria.

The Arab peoples have been infected by the totalitarian ideology of Islam, just like the German people once was infected by the totalitarian ideology of Nazism. Bear in mind that Islam isn't a race but a political ideology disguised as a religion.

You may love the Arabs and despise Islam at the same time, that's no contradiction, and you may love the Germans and despise Nazism. Actually, there are Christian Arabs, and they're often quite nice indeed.

Considering that so many Christians in Arab countries are on the run for their lives from Islam, it may be a good idea to accept them as refugees, instead of those they're running from. Or would you have accepted German Nazis as refugees in WWII, instead of German Jews?

Childless lords sat in aged halls musing on heraldry or in high cold towers asking questions of the stars. And so the kingdom of Gondor sank into ruin, the line of kings failed, the white tree withered and the rule of Gondor was given over to lesser men."
I am starting to think Tolkien had some degree of prophecy about him. Beautiful but depressing. I hope we have an Aragorn of our own somewhere amongst our kin.

This is the crux of Europe's problem. "Everything finishes with them."

I have grandchildren and unfortunately am fully aware of the short-term thinking of the current crop of leaders.

Most amusing is how gullibly everybody swallowed the simplistic dogma that we need Muslims now to (As if!) support us in our old age. What (snigger) could possibly go wrong with that?! Nobody even stops to consider that, were such a need to develop, there are other--likely far less expensive (economically and culturally)--options. The herdthink promoting this idea is darkly comical.

How quickly we forget that great nations are built and sustained on the backs of immigrants. How easily nationalism becomes an excuse for bigotry, xenophobia and a lack of compassion. And how ignorant of anyone to believe that leaders must have children of their own to be concerned for the future.

Leftists never let fact, reason, logic, nor law interfere with ideology. This is proof of the left's insanity. Their gods are the earth, diversity (as long as it does not include skin color, which they wish to be an all inclusive brown), globalism, and communism/socialism. What better future could mankind have than being led by the insane?

The politics of the last 60 years can be surmised into a single word: Sterility

Neo-Malthusian environmentalism, feminism, promotion of homosexuality and gender confusion, anti-religious rhetoric, promotion of abortion and contraceptives, no-fault divorce, subsidized immigration of parasites, even aid to third world is given based upon the idea that after becoming more wealthy they will have less children.

We are now living in momentous times, the future belong to those that are resistant to this insane cult of sterility and able to act upon it.

This is exactly the same with my friends. Invariably the older leftists are childless. They live a life of endless hedonism with superficial 'concern' for the world. They have no responsibilities. Virtue signalling is their constant pastime. They are completely vicious and rapacious when it comes to their self interest - house value, cost of airfares....
I have to admit that when I see them I am reminded that their constantly voiced snide opinions are irrelevant - except that they vote!

Nothing new here, the one thing we have in common with many extinct civilisations is the belief that we are too big to fail.

The tragic irony is that the most advanced civilisation in world history has become too enlightened to survive against the most barbaric, backward and evil.

There is a saying in Greek: You can bang at the deaf's door as long as you wish, he won't hear you! It's the Greek version for the Latin: vox clamantis in deserto, which I am afraid is the case for your site. Nobody, or very few are listening, unfortunately, which means that there is no hope for white, Christian Europe!

It is a madness, an insanity. These arguments rely on the meanings of words being changed, even reversed. Words representing anything complex have no meaning at all, so they can be used interchangeably and assembled in a meaningless slurry. Logic and evidence present discomfort, awkward choices. We no longer deal with moral choices, right and wrong. Making judgments that one thing or one belief is better than another is discouraged; in schools and universities it is taught that making such judgments is itself immoral; would be a sin if there were a god against whom to sin.

Black is black and white is white used to be a truism. Nowadays we have my reality and your reality. there is no need for them to the same for us to be able to communicate or think we are communicating. I have my labels to stick on you and you have yours to stick on me, the label is all the evidence I need and people like me need to know how to treat you, but their labels count whereas yours don't, well, not for them anyway.

So Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, what's the difference? Aren't they all about as useless as each other? Aren't they all just magic? Tell me your labels and I'll tell you why you should vote for me. You don't need to know who I am, just that I'll give you want you want - and you over there - and you , and you - and none of you will have to pay, someone else will but they won't be wearing your labels so no need to worry about that; for you it's free..

"'finding ourselves' becomes more important than building a world. The long chain of generations has already done that for us. Now let us play".

A modern variant of Poe's "Masque of the Red Death" -- The prince and his subjects stage a masked ball in his castle, while death stalks the party. Or maybe it's an update on Nero and his fiddle while Rome burns.

People who, because they have no children, do not understand the present and the future of humanity, generate disorder. But those same people, who generate that disorder, if they had children, would continue to generate disorder.

Well, sensitivity, respect for people, humanism, has nothing to do with personal circumstances, circumstantial. A sensitive person, not indifferent, abides by the fact of life, to generate order.

Order, which can only come, when we are serious, wholly responsible for our lives, that of others, others. Whether they live with us, near, or in the other part of the world.

The death of Europe is the triumph of anti-Christian philosophy that embraces death instead of life. The Muslims, with all their faults, do have a will to live and they will take over the land mass of the living dead, Europe.

The news from Europe continues to get more depressing with every report from those who are 'on the ground' and in the know, and who have the intellectual capacity to reasonably project the political future for Europeans. Are ALL Europeans really so indifferent or uninformed about the certain dangers that lie ahead for them and their progeny? It is unarguable that it is the European voting public that elected these disastrous and politically suicidal leaders. So what is the explanation? Are these populations uniquely suicidal also? Or is it that they have failed to comprehend the threat that lies ahead? If so, why the absence of political awareness? The world now knows of the primitive barbarism of a very determined insurgent and " caliphate driven" foreign army. There are few countries in the world where Islamists are not waging war - the biggest prizes of this war being wealthy, developed Europe. It is equally clear, from the evidence of the slaughter of all who were non Muslim in the regions taken by these Islamists, that European citizens will be similarly dealt with - unless they stand up and fight - NOW - and rid themselves of those politicians who appear to be driven by a death wish. We have seen lemmings behave in this manner, but with more reason.

I don't think being childless is a complete answer for Angela MERKEL's conduct. Having children and grandchildren obviously influences the desire that they are given protection and the best chance to flourish in the future. This however is based upon our own perceptions of the best of our culture and the way of life that we have experienced.

For example, Australia has had an exceptional period of freedom, choice, prosperity for those who wish to seek and work for it and a wonderful lifestyle. We have not taken it for granted, and realise the cost paid by previous generations and Allies for enabling us to live the life we do today. We have that feeling that we would be betraying them for allowing what they laid down their lives to protect, to be just frittered away. Unfortunately even here, there are those who believe like MACRON, that there is no French or Australian culture. Not true! Our way of life and freedom is our culture.

MERKEL however has only German quests for domination and totalitarian ideals to look back on in their history. She doesn't accept that the World has forgiven the current ethnic Germans for the sins of their fathers. They cannot he held responsible for that. The way of life of the German people post WW2 is now their culture and it has been one of freedom, opportunity and safety just like many other Western Countries. She lead Germany in recent years to the heights in this regard; but for reasons unknown to us has now decided to instead, oversee this great countries' destruction. It is definitely more than being childless.

The premise of this article is superficially plausible to me, but I do not believe that the childlessness of European leaders is the *primary or fundamental* reason that Europe is being suicidal.

I'm 62 years old and childless, but I care profoundly about the continuation of societies that have built their foundations on reason and on the freedoms of thought, expression, religion, and trade. Why do I care?

It's personal.

Please be patient while I take you through a process. You might not see how this relates at first, but I think that it's far more pertinent to the disaster we're facing than childlessness.

From the time I was a very young child I realized that I needed to keep my mind honest - to not let myself get away with believing something just because I wanted to or because the people around me wanted me to. I could see that a mind should seek out "the whole truth and nothing but the truth" (a phrase I learned from Perry Mason), because if I didn't get the whole truth, I might draw the wrong conclusion and then make the wrong decisions. That would not be likely to end well.

Finding out the truth had to be my first concern, even though it could be difficult, even tricky. I knew that even though I tried, sometimes I would make mistakes, but as long as I was happy to correct myself when I discovered my mistakes, I could still respect myself.

I came to all of this because I had drawn the wrong conclusion about something and had acted on that conclusion, because I hadn't known enough to do otherwise. And as a result, I had been unjust to my mother. When I found out that I had been terribly wrong, I mined the situation for everything I could learn from it.

Having become explicitly aware of why I needed to seek the whole truth of a situation, I also realized (after another personal event) that sometimes a person who looked for the truth might have to stand alone. What if I was more careful and more honest than other people about some important thing? What if people disliked me for telling truths they didn't want to hear?

To me, it was a question of keeping my mind in touch with the truth and building it into a mind that could discover truths and solve problems and be just, versus being liked by people who weren't so scrupulous. If in such a situation I chose to be liked by others I wouldn't be able to stand myself. I could get away from other people, but I had to live inside my own head. There was no escape from myself. My mind was me. I had to keep it honest. If I corrupted my mind, I corrupted me. My core sense of self - my core identity - became this promise to keep my mind honest.

Okay, there's my personal basis for loving liberty. It's because I know that the only thing that can squash the living motivation out of me is a society that punishes people severely for being honest, rational, just, inquiring, intelligent, intellectually independent, and creative. A society that upholds the individual's right to live by these virtues of mind is a society that fosters discovery and invention, and protects every person from those who would infringe on their lives and property by force. It's a society that allows the human mind to live and function at its best.

I want to live in a society that respects the honest human mind. I couldn't bear to live in any other. And I deeply love those who keep their minds honest and who understand the need for freedom of expression and interaction with other honest minds. I feel a personal connection to that kind of mind all the way back into history and forward into the future. They're *my* people, regardless of race or ethnic background, gender, sexual preference, etc. I *identify* as an honest mind who wants to find the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the best of my ability, and I have a special love for others whose core identity is that.

I want to preserve individual liberty, as recognized in the US Constitution, for my people. The other kind of minds will still be able to benefit from all the discovery and invention and liberty, sure, even though they tend to not understand the roots of their good fortune, or even appreciate their good fortune. And they idiotically do things that break the liberty down.

There's the problem, people: dishonest and/or lazy minds that haven't done the work that a mind should do to understand the foundations of the *best kind of human culture*. These are the minds that come up with destructive junk like Post Modernism and multiculturalism and infect the minds of their students with the same. They destroy the proper university's mission of truth-seeking by pushing the idea that objectivity is impossible and that the most important identity is your race,ethnic group, gender, etc.,etc.,etc. They aim to destroy independent, honest, inquiring minds and encourage by all means possible the emotionalist, easily manipulated fool who wants more than anything to *belong*.

And guess who else built a system that damns honest, independent thought and inquiry? Read the Quran. It screams out at you from every page.

If you undermine the intellectual foundations through the schools and hence the culture, and then flood that society with hundreds of thousands or millions of people from cultures that are hostile to intellectual, individual liberty, that's the final shot to the head.

I am childless. But I love what's great in the human spirit with all my being, and I know that it can't live in a world run by the enemies of that greatness, that honesty. I have no children, but I have *my people*, past, present, and future. And I want to honor those of the past by keeping their great legacy alive for those of the present and the future. I want my people to live, prosper, and be happy.

That Europe's leaders have no progeny is much more important in their psychological makeup than just political ideology. It demonstrates that they do not believe in family units or marriage as a permanent unit the base office governance. They have achieved what no other generation has achieved in over 5,000 years; a dislike for the divine injunction to multiply. They have broken the "Everlasting Covenant." As their bodies have become useless sepulchers, so has their house become desolate. Not one stone will be left in place when the hordes advance upon them.

The USA and the European countries are nations of "infidels". Islamic doctrine calls upon Muslims to kill "infidels". While Western leaders, with the exception of Trump, ignore the Islamic death sentence for the people they purport to lead, the Muslim World takes the Islamic doctrine of "death to infidels" very seriously. The Sunnis and the Shiites each consider the other to be "infidels", and they have been killing each for centuries, for that reason. They still are, today, and, of course, they have been killing non-Muslim "infidels", as well.

I don't agree that the absence of parenthood may be the cause of the remarkable failure of Western leaders to confront the threat to their people. It is, rather, an inevitable consequence of fuzzy-minded liberalism.

I am so sick of hearing the utter lie from these politicians that all of this is to beef up the population because of a lack of children being born.

Something is grossly wrong with the way we have setup out societies if they will fail unless they keep eternally growing bigger and bigger. If the birthrate had stopped altogether, then yes, there would be a problem. But it hasn't. And the reasons why its slowed cannot be blamed solely on female emancipation and shouldn't be blamed on it. And the ONLY alternative shouldn't be to import horde's of uneducated people who have no interest in continuing the aims of that society they've been bought into.

If Germany wanted to increase its tax base, it could have plucked from a pretty large pool of preexisting Europeans who are already unemployed. Greece and Italy come to mind. It seems that at least a third of the Polish are living elsewhere in Europe - so invite them along, at least they're still European, share the same values and are prepared to work and fit in.

I agree on the idea that a childless leader is unable to see further into the future apart from their own life. I too, am currently childless and while I worry about the future of our societies, I can't really grasp the mind numbing fear of leaving behind a complete disaster for my children. I have no doubt, that when I do have a child, that fear will set in and I will understand. Perhaps there's a lesson to be learned in this regarding childless people making long term decisions that impact future generations.

One thing is for sure. The EU elites, these people who are doing their best to destroy the future of the West - they will be remembered. Historically as the people who caused the destruction of the West. Remember how strongly we all remember Hitler, the Tsars, Stalin etc etc. They aren't remembered fondly. Their memory is cursed. That is Merkel's future and Macron's and May's and Blair's and Hollande's and all the others.

Interesting but, surely some of them have nieces or nephews.

Not just childless but without a sense of the importance of the Christian faith.

Macron speaks of colonialism as a "crime against humanity". Yet he hastens the colonisation of France by hostile unassimilable Muslims.

Not having children is probably a part of the problem, since having them should contribute to having a longer-term view of things -- but it's a minor part of the problem, and in other ways not a problem at all since most places are overpopulated, and a gradual reduction over time would be a good thing.

Many in politics are consumed with pushing their ideology on everyone, to the exclusion of everything else, even if they have children. Many others are devoted to the continuation of their culture and expansion of freedom into the future, though they have no children. The problem is more that so many of the people in power are intent on forcing everyone to live according to their particular ideology rather than leave them alone to live as they please. Socialism, and the belief among too many politicians that their way is the right way, and the only way, and must be forced on everyone for their own good, are the real problems.

The socialist welfare-state is responsible for much of the lack of production, and the supposed shortage of labor that doesn't really exist. Large numbers of the stupid and lazy are living at the public expense, through various sorts of government assistance, rather than doing the menial jobs foreigners are imported to do, earning their own way, and contributing to the general prosperity of their countries, The protectionist legal preferences given to both labor and industry stifle production, drive up prices, and eliminate the competition that would make most things cheaper and more plentiful, raising the standard of living for everyone.

More people is not the answer, but a freer system with less government involvement in everything. However many people there are, are going to have to produce enough to provide for themselves -- more people is not a help, more production from those already here is.

Can a person be worldcentric while simultaneously including an ethnocentric perspective; that is, why can't world leaders be fully capable of managing civilization without having the responsibilities of managing a family? Is raising a family a prerequisite for being a qualified world leader, or could it be that liberation from the distractions of ethnocentric family values can and does create the mind-space that allows leaders to appreciate a greater sense of what it means to be compassionate toward all sentient beings?

If there are those who would exploit the spiritual gifts of those whose realization of those gifts is their primary goal in life, then the perpetrators of such atrocities are to be held accountable for such transgressions and not those who are enlightened enough to appreciate the potential of a new world that is rich with self-actualized human beings.

Within an ethical civilization, the transgression of ethical precepts that stand as the hallmarks of that civilization must be addressed by those leaders whose direct knowledge of the truth empowers them to act with an authority to admonish and rectify the wrongdoing or forever face the interior disquietude that will most assuredly arise within the sanctity of their precious souls.

Europe now has the opportunity to evolve into a co-creative worldcentric and transrational community of humanity. Yes, there will be those whose will to power will exceed their desire for actualizing this opportunity as a reality; however, for those whose attention does not falter from the intention of accomplishing such a grand objective, the greater the momentum gained the sooner will the goal be attained.

"Murray, in his new book, entitled The Strange Death of Europe, called it "an existential 'civilisational tiredness'".

Murray echoes what Kenneth Clark could already see in the late 60s -- those late 60s that are still being replayed by academics trying to recapture their fatuous youth while imposing it on our culture. Hear Lord Clark:

"Of course, civilisation requires a modicum of material prosperity - enough to provide a little leisure. But, far more, it requires confidence - confidence in the society in which one lives, belief in its philosophy, belief in its laws, and confidence in one's own mental powers.... Vigour, energy, vitality: all the great civilisations - or civilising epochs - have had a weight of energy behind them. People sometimes think that civilisation consists in fine sensibilities and good conversation and all that. These can be among the agreeable results of civilisation, but they are not what make a civilisation, and a society can have these amenities and yet be dead and rigid.

"So if one asks why the civilisation of Greece and Rome collapsed, the real answer is that it was exhausted."

The French see the ruination of their world delivered by the likes of Macron. And yet, they vote for him. Why? Because they have given up.

"En marche...." Oui, en marche vers l'oubli. Onward to oblivion.

Politicians are sleepwalking us to disaster, because they do not (want to) listen to scientists. Marc Rutte formally refused to do so.

Scientific research has clearly demonstrated that to stop the ecological- and economic crises and to end rampant poverty, the consumer has to be compensated for spending all of his money only on products that keep nature in perfect condition.

Billions of consumers will then buy only such products. Producers will have to satisfy their demand by competing with each other until they supply only 100 % ecological products. It will not take them 100 years to achieve this. Then consumers will, by their ways of living, safeguard the integrity of nature and mankind can survive.

The industrialised world cannot immediately supply such ecological products. The countries surrounding the industrialised world, which are not yet industrialised, can relatively quickly develop green industries and become the suppliers of goods and services for ways of living in harmony with nature. The refugees from these countries will go back to their countries of origin to help develop these industries. The economies of these countries will take off, poverty there will disappear and peace will break out.

Would you, editor of Gatestone Institute be willing to consider informing the public at large about these scientific research results? If you do, politicians might listen, to you. More is explained at www.biosustainable.org.

It is as if they have become inhuman and care only for themselves, their power and the here and now. So sad, so foolish and so lost. It's just a great pity for the ones who have children but even among many of those, the family seems to mean little as they in their hedonism, also do nothing to protect family and cultural values.

EUROPE'S CHILDLESS LEADERS! -- Oh, yes! SUICIDE is the bombshell for Europeans accepting hordes of Muslims into their countries, having devastating effects, and the destruction of hundreds of years of phenomenal cultural and civilized advances for society. Unfortunately, Europe is in the throes of an Alzheimer and thrombosis syndrome with little hope for recovery. The European people themselves together with their elected officials have long since cast the net for the destruction of their existence. They shall reap what they have sewn!

Whether a person has children or not is a private matter. If a person sets themselves up as a leader they should have have a sufficiently broadminded and eclectic attitude to negate their personal preference/situation. This is obviously not the case given the depths to which our our Idiots In Charge (IIC) descend. Many of the IIC do have children so I doubt if Mr Meotti's case will stand scrutiny.

I have no children because I could not afford them but I care deeply about the future. Since the vast majority of Muslims never work (I can't remember the statistics-70 or 80%) there is some other reason for Merkel et al doing this. They could easily bring in workers from Eastern Europe who are poor and want to work and have compatible beliefs and religions to Western Europeans.

So what do you make of the many horrific governments led by parents? The approach and conclusions discussed in this article are as backward as the oppressive cultures this institute claims to oppose.

"God is the state. The state is God" - Leon Trotsky

Who needs children when you have the state.

And they have outsourced reproduction to others!!!

"Europe today has little desire to reproduce itself, fight for itself or even take its own side in an argument". — Douglas Murray, The Times. -- This is exactly what I have thought, not only of Europeans, but the U.S. and Canada as well. In the U.S., the Democrats even refuse to use the term "Islamic Terrorism" to describe the Islamic jihadist attacks on Western Culture and Western Civilization! I keep asking "When is enough, enough?" to cause a definitive response by the Western nations against the obvious Islamic threat. It is not as if the conflict with Islam is a new threat or experience to Europe, it has been ongoing for thousands of years to the present. The current "Political Correctness" is a recipe for Western suicide!

Europeans do not want children. Europeans have a weary death wish.

Now, I can see. Where is the next generation when is no procreation!

Theresa May should not be in the list:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/theresa-reveals-heartbreaking-struggle-children-8337595

"Theresa May reveals heartbreaking struggle to have children which 'affected' both her and husband"

Rule Is: Only extremely self-centered, selfish people can elect to remain childless.

Oh!I forgot, we're talking about politicians.

Interesting, indeed! I coined the phrase "lemming Left" watching Israeli elections 2 years ago - Herzog boasted at the time of having regular conversations with Obama, who was patently anti-Israel! I have thought that Europe 'rolled over on her back' and handed the 'keys to political Islam' over the Iran Nuclear Deal. But I hadn't got to the psychology BEHIND the actions- this multi-cultural loss of identity and INSTINCT TO PROTECT ALL THAT IS GOOD IN YOUR HOME CULTURE. If you don't respect and treasure that which is good in your own culture, how would you wish to defend it?

Spot on, Giulio Meotti!

I could not agree for more. How can they speak about future and they do not have any children? How can they speak about future life, even short term future, and they have allowed abortions, gay marriage, euthanasia. Yes, there is no new blood in Europe except from immigrants. It reminds me about the fall of the Roman Empire.

Insightful, amazing analysis. Thank you, Giulio Meotti and Gatestone.

You are so right. My family, for example. Two girls, two boys. The girls are married with two children each. That's all they can afford, they say. The two boys will never marry. The younger one has terminal cancer and will not see Christmas. The older boy is bi-polar and has difficulty relating to the real world. This line of the Grattan family dies with me...

The depopulation of western "Christian" societies seems to be the result of a deliberate strategy. In the 1960s young people in Britain were inundated by statistics regarding the overpopulation of the world. The children we did produce have had to struggle with huge mortgages because of the manipulation of house prices, so many could not afford to have more than one, or, indeed any children. Women have been encouraged to compete with men in the workplace, and neglect the serious business of the family. Meanwhile, over in the third world, people have been starving because they have produced large populations which are unsustainable because of poor government, bad agricultural practices etc., so the overspill has been flooding to the West for decades now and we are supposed to push up and make room for them.

What is not discussed or beyond the scope of this article but certainly not irrelevant to the discussion is the regressive liberal socialists intentness to characterize motherhood as a negative, traditional sexual roles as a negative, while elaborately promoting "sexual" freedom and expression and abortions, aka choice. They literally throw the baby out with the bath water, proclaim procreation unimportant, and anti-gay, while bonding with the Islamists in what can only be described as a murderous suicidal rage.

Gatestone should publish this in every news paper and TV stations.
These politicians are playing right into the hand of Islam
This should be a warning to the civilized world, otherwise, the world will be dominated by Islam

The powder is rising in the keg. Who will supply the match?

At last I now understand why the political leaders across Europe seemed so unconcerned about the safety of their (indigenous) citizens and were unmoved by the mass rapes and murders committed by the uncivilised savages they allowed free access to our homelands. The political leaders who sanctioned these crimes should all stand trial for treason and or crimes against humanity. I can think of a few of those leaders I would not grant a fair trial to, they would not deserve one.

In real terms, these politicians with no children couldn't give a damn for the rest of us. They will be more than happy to see a Muslim takeover of Europe because they know that their families will never suffer the consequences of their "liberal approach" to mass suicide!

Why the German people haven't got the message yet is amazing! Macron has no children, Theresa May has no children, Merkel hasn't got children, and that's just 3 of the many leaders in Europe who are leading their countries into a very dangerous period in their history. And why should they care? They won't be around to see what damage they have inflicted on the continent of Europe. They will either fly off to a Muslim free country or be long dead and far beyond worrying what their people think of them. Obviously, they care very little now! Opening the door to a culture that clashes with our own culture and values, is most definitely, a recipe for disaster.

Despite all the evidence to the contrary regarding the integration and assimilation, they still walk around in their own delusionary little world hoping that one day their dream of multicultural heaven comes to fruition!

The most worrying of this is that we are helpless to stop these foolish people from pursuing their nonsensical dreams. All we and our families that actually survive after we are long gone, will be the ones to suffer the consequences.

It's apparent that people have become so wrapped up in their own race to achieve personal wealth that they don't follow what is happening in Europe and how things are changing right in front of them. They may just as well have been born wearing blinkers! And not many are actually taking note of news bulletins concerning attacks on their fellow citizens by, so called "refugees".

Macron states that there is no "French culture". If he had been around in the 18th century France when the revolution took place or later when Napoleon Bonaparte was conquering most of Europe, he would have seen "French Culture" first hand. Idiot! What does he strive for now, Islamic Culture?

The premise of this article is silly as is the article: one can have many children and not be overly concerned about their future or your nation's future and have no children and be concerned about the future of your nation as well as the world.

Their criminal blindness has no excuse. Being childless (sometimes not a choice) could also mean that the only thing that justifies one's life is faith in the continuation of cherished values and a cherished land. The contrary of those so-called elites' creed, "après moi, le deluge". After me, the deluge.