Why Christian Leaders Ignore Attacks on Their Community

Anyone who swallowed George Bush's Jr. drivel about Islam being "a religion of peace" was beyond mentally challenged. Did 9/11 and all the murderous Muslim jihad attacks that followed, London underground, Madrid train bombing, Paris, Nairobi's Westgate Mall, Mumbai, Boston marathon, Nice, Brussels, Orlando, etc., etc, with all the accompanying barbarism never really penetrate Western minds? Anyone who still believes such disgraceful nonsense about Islam is beyond redemption - but if you're a Western liberal everything is possible.

The United Nations is part of the problem, they allowed Hamas to use money for their weapons. All the money given for the civilians went to the Hamas leaders and weapons. The United Nations is nothing but a front for the one world government, which is the government of Satan

Leon, the United Nations long ago lost its purpose as an organization committed to promoting civilization. Today the U.N. is dominated by the Muslim OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference) that being 'Islamic' does not represent or promote civilization. It wants Islam to dominate with barbaric, morals-destite, intellectually-devoid, imbecilic sharia law. One look at Afghanistan tells you what results from such intellectually limited and barbaric persuasions. It tells you how deep intellectually, spiritually and morally countries like Canada and the U.K. have sunk when you learn that Sharia is permitted in these feckless, dimwitted societies.

Leon, it's beyond me to understand how you can have the remotest faith in Pope Francis. This gutless, evil Pope never condemns Muslim barbarism against Christians in Nigeria, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Mozambique or anywhere. He never will "speak out in whatever way might be most effective". He has encouraged communists to keep going i.e with their atheistic message. He encourages blessing for homosexual couples, yet the Bible condemns homosexuality. Conclusion: Pope Francis is not even a true Christian. If the Catholic Church was true to the Christian faith it would unceremoniously kick him out onto the gutter where he belongs. The Catholic Church is rotting within and has been for a long time. That good, faithful priests have been expelled because of Pope Francis, tells us about the state of the current Catholic Church.

I know, Sue. 100% agree. I asked 'how about asking the UN to intervene', bc i already know the answer and was hoping libs et al might ask themselves that question.

I totally agree, Rob. I do not have the remotest faith in this pope (or any preceding pope). I said the pope "SHOULD speak out" which i maintain is true. Even tho he represents one of the most evil organizations on the planet, he sometimes pretends at Christian values and therefore "should" speak out accordingly but we know he won't. He has a world wide following and his voice would at least make some difference to the views of many who do think he's worthy. Even an evil person can sometimes be used for good by God. I was hoping my questions of UN and pope etc might cause libs and/or Catholics to think about it a little.

Leon, although a Protestant I haven't been anti-Catholic because over years that church has produced some excellent Christians, G.K. Chesterton just one and then these priests who have been expelled by Pope Francis. I speak of Bishop Strickland, Friar James Altman of Wisconsin whose bluntness appeals to my South African disposition, and numbers of others who for conducting themselves like Christian priests have been given the boot by Pope Francis.
Many of those men who went on the Crusades were devout Christians, but any Catholic who falls for this Pope's pagan nonsense has the brains of turnip, The Muslim dominated U.N. and Liberals deserve each other. It doesn't matter how many Christians are murdered in Nigeria, the U.N. says nothing and the Muslims make sure of this. The Muslims are cheering.

I think we're in agreement on most those things, too, Rob. Although I am quite opposed to Catholic teachings I take any and all individual Catholics "at face value" because i don't know any individual's heart, unless they choose to reveal where they stand on key issues. I take issue with most Catholics I've come to know well, of course, which is why i am Protestant, but i try to discuss and not accuse and sometimes i see hearts that i cannot possibly condemn even in my own mind. But the popes, esp current one, and probably some socially activist priests, are surely playing with a fire that even they may not understand or even believe.

The fact is that the R.C. Church has perpetrated a lie. The Sanhedrin and a few others, not all Jews, called for Jesus crucifixion, while many Jews remained faithful to Him and after His ascension "spread the gospel" far and wide.
When we look at the state of Europe today it's evident that Catholic Church has done a lousy job. Empty or almost empty churches, and few if any care then Muslims burn them down. Now most Europeans are agnostic, believe in nothing spiritual and are so convictionless that they couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag. In France Muslims murder Jews and courts find that the murderer has smoked marijuana so is unfit to stand trial. What the cowardly French courts are really concerned about is trying a Muslim for murdering the hated Jew and causing riots.
Worldwide media ignoring or hushing up of Muslim barbarism toward Christians in Nigeria and all over Africa, tell us much about the state of morality in the West today. I marvelled when in 2022 the Muslims of al-Shabaab invaded Mozambique, murdered hundreds, even decapitated 10 year-olds and displaced more than 500,000. In Canada we read nothing about what should have been front-page news. And then once again yet another useless African government proved incapable of mounting an attack on the savages, or of organizing a united military front with Kenya, Tanzania and other east African countries. In Africa the best action taken against Muslim barbarism was that of Nigeria in 2015/16. It brought in a couple of hundred South African mercenaries who in 3 1/2 months had accomplished against Boko Haram what the entire Nigerian army had failed to accomplish in 6 years - and they took no prisoners, just killed the lot.

The Roman Catholic church has never, to my knowledge, separated the Sanhedrin from the rest of the Jews. You are correct, it was the Sanhedrin, or at least most of it (I think Gamaliel so and Nicodemus may have demurred), who wanted Jesus crucified. But the church has taught and practiced generalize antisemitism for all these centuries. During the dark ages, many of the inquisitions were specifically carried out against Jews.

Sandra, it was only in recent years that I discovered that during the inquisition Protestants, too, were targeted by the R.C. Church. I truly wonder how the R.C. Church rationalizes the 'un-Christian;' lies it has told. I credit the R.C. Church for launching the Crusades to stop Islam, but struggle with its corruption and dishonesty. If truly honest it would acknowledge that there was sound basis for Martin Luther's 95 thesis. The Church had slid into corruption, not least with the sale of indulgences, and needed to be confronted. Instead they tried to murder Luther. If they truly believed in God, how did they manage to think that God did not see their evil ways?

Yes, particularly leaders of reformation groups, but even before them, groups like the Waldensians never strayed from the apostolic teaching and format for the church, and were literally hunted to extinction. Luther Wycliffe, Fundamental and others tried to reform from within, but the hierarchy, not unlike the Danger run before them, we're having none of it, excommunicated, and later hunted them, martyring several, before it was all said and done. They don't justify, they just claim sole propriety to Christianity, and go on their merry way, practicing some truly heretical rituals and beliefs.

Sandra, quite a chuckle you gave me. And this is (to them) the only true Christian Church? Heaven help us if it were! It's bad enough watching some Protestant churches nowadays! Just consider how the Knights Templars were falsely incriminated through excruciating torture by France's King Philip IV - and the Pope, even if reluctantly, supported this.
Anyone who has seen the Knights Templars' engravings on the wall of their prison at Domme, knows they are distinctly Christian in character and created by true believers. I was quite amazed. In fairness the R.C. Church today says the Templars were falsely accused and executed, but I marvel at all the lies and corruption in which the church was embroiled - as if God did not exist and didn't watch their miserable sins played out. Where was their "fear of God"? As it says in Proverbs 9:10, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding." No "wisdom" or "understanding" was evident, so these 'holy' men now rot in hell. Proverbs 10:27, "The fear of the Lord prolongs days: but the years of the wicked shall be shortened." Louis IV's days were "shortened". As the last Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, was dying in flames he cursed Louis IV - who died shortly thereafter and we can bet is rotting in hell - along with a few Popes. Lovely company for Lenin, Trotsky, Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mohammad, Genghis Khan, Pierre Trudeau, Lyndon Johnson. And Bill Clinton is looking forward to sex parties down there!

I'm glad you got a chuckle, but that is what they have taught and claimed for nearly two millennia, despite never having been founded by an apostle (the church in Rome was established before Paul went there; Dr Luke named no one who preceded him there, although another lie claims Peter did found it, apparently while still in Jerusalem, somehow).
Remember Friday the 13th? The Templars were mostly executed by the sitting pope, with whom they'd got in a spat, on a Friday the 13th, and the "unlucky" stuck since. But yes, it was a personal issue with that pope, and their execution and accusations were unjust. It was the pope who accused them, not the king. Like Jesus, where the danger run were compelled to act through the Roman authorities, so the Pope had to move through the civil authorities, on this.
I can't prove it; I have never seen or heard a clear explanation for it, from Catholics, but look at a Protestant cross and a Catholic cross: what difference do you see? I believe that difference explains many things in reality, particularly about their lack of fear of God.

Sandra, you taught me two things in your blog, first that the church in Rome "was not founded by an apostle". With reservations because I came to realize that the R.C. Church simply 'makes up stuff', I came to believe that Peter founded the church in Rome.
Secondly, through dishonest history I came to believe that the Pope simply accepted King Philip IV's accusations of Templar blasphemy (extracted by extreme torture) rather than he concocting the blasphemy and then let Philip IV (a lying scumbag in any event) do the dirty work of immolation.
Another surprise to me a few years ago, was discovering that the supposed saintly Sir Thomas More had six men burned at the stake for accepting Martin Luther's teachings.

Almost certainly!

No, it's not likely that "the same or similar things have occurred in Protestant churches as well". Protestant pastors and priests get married which is not to suggest that no perverts have existed in Protestant churches. The most disgraceful side to what has happened in the Catholic Church is the cover-ups by higher authorities and the moving of pervert priests to other parishes - where they can continue their abuse. If this had happened to one of my children some priest would have found himself very badly smashed up with a baseball bat.

For a Catholic, it is very difficult to see politics substitute for truth. This is not always associated with modern liberalism but certainly is more often than not. This is not unique to the present pope, but meandering into the simplistic nonsense of "social justice" and attaching it to man-made climate change must finally end as destructive rather than constructive. The eventual need for the coercive force of government will continue to erode the progress in human freedom and prosperity. It saddens me.

He didn't, and won't!

Why didn't the present Pope speak to the UN about Asiya Bibi, a Roman Catholic farm worker in Pakistan, convicted under their perverted Sharia law with blasphemy and sentenced to death?
Even the late devout Moslem governor of her province, z"l [and he deserves z"l, because he died for Kiddush HaShem], defended her and was murdered for it by another Moslem.
Her husband and sons had been got out from Pakistan, and pleaded with the Pope in NYC, but seemingly fake 'Climate Warming' was more important than the life of one of his flock.
And where is he when 120,000 Armenians in Artsakh AKA Nagorno-Karabakh are being threatened with torture, rape and murder by Azeri Moslem forces, and indeed, over 10,000 have already been raped and murdered. Armenian Apostolic Christians and Yazidis there are under threat of genocide.
And not the fake genocide the 'Balestinians' go on about. REAL Genocide.
And the mass murder of Catholics and other Christians in Nigeria, in Kenya, etc.

The National Council of Churches, including their seminaries, aligned themselves, and by extension, all their colleagues give members,with the globalist movement, just about the time socialist POTUS FDR was being inaugurated. I am not sure if Rabbinic leaderships joined in that or not. But it included agreement to no longer teach or preach key gospel components. They have kept that agreement.

Lone Star, homosexual blessing is not contrary to African Catholic Churches alone. It is supposed to be contrary to ALL Christian churches in accordance with what is stated in Romans chapter 1 and Leviticus 18. There we see that homosexuality is an "abomination in the sight of God". Now abundantly evident, the Pope in nothing more than disgraceful, fraud, Pope who embraces false teaching and is no Christian. If present Catholic leadership was truly Christian, Pope Francis would be past history, but it seems that the Vatican is rotten to the core so he is permitted to stay. Do these men really believe in and fear God? Probably not, so what we see is a charade.

That was a repeat of Leviticus for the benefit of the Gentile audience who were unfamiliar with the Law. Yhwh God's pronouncement against that, and other behaviors was not capricious, but because they harm the human participants, physically, psychologically and spiritually, and He was protecting us from our own lusts.

Yes, it is, but it is NOT the language we are expected to "speak"! Defending our own, or others', lives yes, absolutely that is permissible. Shooting to prevent damage to things, however, is another matter entire!y. Where, in the Word, do you find that? Because other than your home and person, or lives, I find no violent response suggested, and then only at night. This comes under turning the other cheek, and not treasuring the things of Earth!

Sandra, I fully understand what you are saying, but at what point do Christians, in Italy for example (in France most don't seem to care about Church desecration and destruction) where Muslim migrants have gone into churches and destroyed religious symbols, stop the destruction and murder? When Jesus talked about the sword He knew exactly for what it was intended, but did not condemn swords. In France both men and women have been both decapitated or had their throat slit by Muslim savages - inside churches.
Frankly, I prefer the response of the Crusaders to more than 400 years of Muslim violence against southern Europe. They did not, in effect, "turn the other cheek", they fought back - all the way to Jerusalem. The Guiscard brothers, Normans, invaded and defeated the Arab Muslims who for 200 years had ruled Sicily. And they did not do so gently. Have you any idea how cruel the Muslims were to Christians living in the Middle East when during the 7th Century the Muslims invaded the Levant? 400 years of misery followed - and now Europe and other foolish Western countries have allowed in these miserable dregs of humanity.

I know; in fact, He instructed His disciples to purchase swords (for self-defense), even if it necessitated selling their cloaks to achieve that . He knew they would need that ability in the world, 'til His return. The Crusaders, however, carried it too far. For 1 thing,they slaughtered many Jews too. For another, without specific direct instructions from Him, Yhwh God frowns on killing others outside direct self or other defense. The popes are, and were, not Yhwh God; their orders don't count.

Sandra, thanks for raising that Jesus instructed his disciples to purchase swords. Today many Christians seem to think it their duty to roll over and play dead and a sin to fight back.
In Jerusalem in 1099, the Jewish inhabitants made one big mistake, they helped the Muslims fight off the Crusaders, so when the Crusaders broke into the city they went after and slaughtered both Arabs and Jews. If you read and study their mood after years of depravation and fighting, by the time they got to Jerusalem the Crusaders were both physically and mentally hard. Soon after conquering Jerusalem, a Muslim army out of Egypt and with superior numbers threatened, so the Crusaders, starving and exhausted went down to meet that army - and defeated it.

I know. Jesus clearly did not hold that view. Selling one's cloak in those times was a big deal among the poorer classes, as that was their "overcoat" and "blanket" rolled into one. Deserts get cold at night (I lived in AZ for over 40 yrs)! Today's Christians remind me of my Catholic neighbors and schoolmates in the '50s and '60s, basically ignorant of the Bible, outside what they hear in snatches at church. As much as the Catholic hate for the Jews of Europe was rampant in that era, and the Israeli Jews heard of the inquisition and pogroms too, that's hardly surprising; they likely expected to be murdered by them as soon as they finished with the Muslims, and might well have had such orders.

Most of the Protestant denominations, like Presbyterian, support BDS and are anti-semites. They are not really Christian any more. They are western statists who do not understand the thousands of year old history between the Jewish people and Israel. Somehow, even the clergy do not understand that Jesus was a Jew and never thought of himself any other way. The Jews in Jesus' time were rising up against the Romans and that is what got Jesus crucified. He was seen by Pontius Pilate as a rabble-rouser. Now it is Islam that is trying to "crucify" modern Jews and like in Jesus' time, they are rising up against the Arab interlopers and fighting back, but with deadlier results now than then.

I am sorry but the Catholic leadership and the Catholic Church are two different things.
I think, based on my readings, that the church has been infiltrated by anti-Christians in the past decades.
During WWII, the Pope and several convents helped numerous Jews by hiding them and creating passports so they can immigrate. On the other hand, Stalin and his secret police manufactured disinformation campaigns against many Catholic leaders, denigrated them and accused them of Nazi collaboration. Unfortunately, many Westerners believe it.

I think that infiltration goes back considerably further... Ever hear of the Machiavellis? That pope was in office about the 14th century, I think, certainly a very long time back down the chain, and was as corrupt as Francis is, at least! He and his clan were definitely not practitioners of Christianity, not even Roman Catholicism!

The Pope organized the First Crusade because of a request from the Byzantine Emperor. Another Pope helped coordinate and fund the ships that fought at Lepanto (1571) and Vienna (1689). Pope John XXIII worked with President Reagan and Margaret Thatcher to bring down the Soviet Union. Pope John XXIII tried to stamp out Liberation Theology in the Roman Catholic Church. I thought he had done it until Francis was named the current pope. Liberation Theology is Communism Light, which is all about the destruction of Western Civilization.
The Our Judeo-Christian heritage created Western Civilization. Out of Christianity came Values & Morals, the Middle Class, Capitalism, and Democracy. Any wonder why they have been under attack since the 1950s.

None whatsoever.
Many men do "good" things without professing Christianity. Works are meant to be an outward evidence of the inner changes, not a means to redemption, but neither are they alone proof thereof. All those fruits of Christianity's impact on humanity and society are anathema to leftism/ godless humanism! For that reason, they must be destroyed and eradicated from memory.

Thank you.

Back in the '30s, the National Council of Churches, including their seminaries, aligned with the PTB and NWO.

You might want to ask the Reformers their opinion on when the infiltration happened! That was a major chunk of why the Reformation occurred!

Red, your point is taken - and valid -some Popes did take wise and forceful action that benefitted Christianity greatly. How sad to see Western civilization with its accomplishments so little valued in the pathetic West today. Leadership is now at an all-time low with miserable, weak creatures making pretences. One look at Canada's Trudeau, America's Biden, France's Macron and the U.K.'s Rishi Sunak, and you get the picture. Not a real 'leader' among them, so Muslim and other migrants just walk in - instead of being hurled out.

Not Pius XII; he was too busy protecting HIS hide and the Vatican itself! There were nuns and priests who did protect Jews, and escaped POWs, but not with his blessing or knowledge. Stalin and Hitler were far more alike than either would acknowledge, in many ways, hatred of the Jews being but one such. Pius XII showed his true colors during the Nazi occupation of Rome, and they were not pretty.

The reason for that request was due to kidnapping and holding Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land for ransom, by the occupying Muslims.
I think you have your popes confused. John XXIII held Vatican II in the '60s, and was the first pope to visit the US. However, he was long dead by the time Reagan and Thatcher were pounding Gorbachev to bring down the USSR in the '80s, That pope was John Paul II.
Liberation "theology" is a mix of socialism communism and black supremacist racism.
Now Francis had 2 strikes against him from the start, as I see it. First, he was raised in Juan Peron's Argentina (a mix of postwar Nazis, and Stalinist communists), and second, the order into which he was ordained is Jesuits. The Jesuits, ordained in 1541, had a two-pronged mission: destroy the Jews, and destroy the Protestant Reformation. The RC church has been trying to force Protestants back into "mother church", as they see it, since Luther nailed his list to the cathedral door in Worms, much like the CCP has been trying to force the Taiwanese back under their control since '49. It was the Protestant Reformation that introduced those values, which are indeed, Judeo-Christian based, Catholicism had failed to do so for nearly 1500 yrs prior.

Those buys are all just puppets: not one has the real power over his nation! That resides mostly in Davos now, and Vatican City.

Well said!

It happened 85 yrs ago, too. The silence under Hitler's campaign of murder of Jews, and faithful Christians (who opposed his slaughter of the Jews) was "deafening" from pope and Protestant leaderships alike. It's called apostasy, and was prophesied as a sign of the end times: we are there!

Yes, I am fully aware of roles of NYT and US Govt (FDR) in the silence, even to the point to rejecting refugees fleeing the Holocaust. I have also learned that I likely had Sephardic relatives who were rounded up in places like Romania and Bulgaria and transported via train to Auschwitz-Birkenau (A-B) for extermination. As I was touring A-B in 2005, I did not know the likely connection to my family. Luckily, my core ancestry had already arrived in US.

Sadly, it was our churches here too; they had already aligned, in the early '30s with the real powers, behind Hitler and Stalin too.

Robert, as we know, that R.C. Bishop "who made the priest apologize" is a coward and poor excuse for a Christian and bishop, but the priest, too, was a coward for apologizing. He should have had the courage to show conviction. In my opinion, Ontario produces a host of cowardly priests who fear 'man above God'. How they face themselves in a mirror baffles me.
By contrast the U.S. has produced numbers of brave priests, among them Strickland and Altman who have sacrificed their clerical positions while standing for truth, but in Ontario we specialize in producing gutless wonders. This applies, too, to the Catholic school in Mississauga attended by my granddaughter. During the last 'Gay pride month' it flew the homosexual flag. In my opinion these are really 'believe-in-nothing' excuses for Christians.

I'm not old enough for that, outside my professional settings (nursing and EMS include such exposures at times), and I'm in my 8th decade now! The word "holiday" itself isn't an insult; it means "holy day". It's the context in which it is abused that is insulting! If there is no Christmas,why were the kids out of school? Why were businesses closed? If there is no Christmas, there is no holy day to celebrate!

The only thing about the Torah that Muslims claim is that it is a corruption of God's Word; this despite the fact it was recorded well over 2 millennia before Muhammad was born. If any Muslims know that was written before Islam existed, I rather doubt they believe it means them...

They have to say so, because to realize that we have the same Torah today as when Jesus came to earth, which is still at least 600 years before Muhammed is said to enter the scene, they would have to acknowledge that Islam is false, because the Quran tells that the Torah is the word of God (Allah in their case) - and that Muhammed is mentioned in the Torah - you know the Torah tells about a great Messiah that would come one day - and one of Muhammed's names is incidentially Messiah... - as Muhammed believed the Torah was telling about him. What can we learn from this? - even the founders of Islam understood that the God of the Bible is the real thing.

No doubt they would start with the Christians among them to use as shields, but they also use their own women and children.

It's the West who needs to wake up and help Africa. Africa cannot put a stop to these savages because only the politician leaders, mostly being communists or Islamists, are wealthy and savages too. The majority, including Christians, are very poor with no means to protect themselves. They experience frequently what Israel experienced on October 7th. In Sudan, Nigeria, Mozambique and countries in between experience the same Muslim brutality on almost a daily basis.